No abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The composition of the dialysate is a crucial feature in the dialysis treatment. Two of its most debated elements are the optimal calcium concentration and the use of acetate as a buffer. Moreover, among the different alternatives to achieve acetate-free dialysis, the use of citrate is postulated as the most suitable option. The objective of this study is to identify the potential beneficial effects of citrate when compared to acetate dialysate (AD) both in short-term effects (especially regarding intradialytic calcium balance and cardiac damage biomarkers) and in medium-term ones with CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) and inflammatory biomarkers measured after twelve sessions performed with each dialysate. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a unicentric, cross-over, prospective study. Each patient underwent 24 dialysis sessions, 12 with each dialysate buffer. Blood samples were taken in 2 different sessions with each acidifier. They include CKD-MBD and inflammatory biomarkers. The calcium concentration of both dialysates was 1.5 mmol/L, while all other dialysis parameters and patients’ treatment remained unchanged during the study period. <b><i>Results:</i></b> When comparing AD and citrate dialysate (CD), there were no differences in pre-dialysis ionized calcium (iCa) (1.11 vs. 1.08 mmol/L) in both groups. However, there was a significant increase in iCa with the use of AD in immediate and 30-min post-dialysis blood samples. In contrast, iCa levels remained stable with the use of citrate. Inflammatory biomarkers were also reduced after the use of CD. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The use of citrate provides interesting advantages when compared to acetate. It maintains iCa levels stable during dialysis sessions with a neutral or negative effect on calcium balance, and it improves the chronic inflammatory condition that comes with long-time hemodialysis treatment. These beneficial effects may lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes.

Acetate is widely used as a dialysate buffer to avoid the precipitation of bicarbonate salts. However, even at low concentrations that wouldn’t surpass the metabolic capacity of the Krebs tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, other metabolic routes are activated, leading to undesirable clinical consequences by poorly understood mechanisms. This study aims to add information that could biologically explain the clinical improvements found in patients using citrate dialysate. A unicentric, cross-over, prospective targeted metabolomics study was designed to analyze the differences between two dialysates, one containing 4 mmol/L of acetate (AD) and the other 1 mmol/L of citrate (CD). Fifteen metabolites were studied to investigate changes induced in the TCA cycle, glycolysis, anaerobic metabolism, ketone bodies, and triglyceride and aminoacidic metabolism. Twenty-one patients completed the study. Citrate increased during the dialysis sessions when CD was used, without surpassing normal values. Other differences found in the next TCA cycle steps showed an increased substrate accumulation when using AD. While lactate decreased, pyruvate remained stable, and ketogenesis was boosted during dialysis. Acetylcarnitine and myo-inositol were reduced during dialysis, while glycerol remained constant. Lastly, glutamate and glutarate decreased due to the inhibition of amino acidic degradation. This study raises new hypotheses that need further investigation to understand better the biochemical processes that dialysis and the different dialysate buffers induce in the patient’s metabolism.

No abstract

Background: Currently, bicarbonate-based dialysate needs a buffer to prevent precipitation of bicarbonate salts with the bivalent cations, and acetate at 3–4 mmol/L is the most used. However, citrate is being postulated as a preferred option because of its association with better clinical results by poorly understood mechanisms. In that sense, this hypothesis-generating study aims to identify potential metabolites that could biologically explain these improvements found in patients using citrate dialysate.Methods: A unicentric, cross-over, prospective untargeted metabolomics study was designed to analyze the differences between two dialysates only differing in their buffer, one containing 4 mmol/L of acetate (AD) and the other 1 mmol/L of citrate (CD). Blood samples were collected in four moments (i.e., pre-, mid-, post-, and 30-min-post-dialysis) and analyzed in an untargeted metabolomics approach based on UPLC-Q-ToF mass spectrometry.Results: The 31 most discriminant metabolomic variables from the plasma samples of the 21 participants screened by their potential clinical implications show that, after dialysis with CD, some uremic toxins appear to be better cleared, the lysine degradation pathway is affected, and branched-chain amino acids post-dialysis levels are 9–10 times higher than with AD; and, on its part, dialysis with AD affects acylcarnitine clearance.Conclusion: Although most metabolic changes seen in this study could be attributable to the dialysis treatment itself, this study successfully identifies some metabolic variables that differ between CD and AD, which raise new hypotheses that may unveil the mechanisms involved in the clinical improvements observed with citrate in future research.