The ZEBRA protein from Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) activates a switch from the latent to the lytic expression program of the virus. ZEBRA, a member of the bZIP family of DNA-binding proteins, is a transcriptional activator capable of inducing expression from viral lytic cycle promoters. It had previously been thought that ZEBRA's capacity to disrupt EBV latency resided primarily in its ability to activate transcription of genes that encode products required for lytic replication. We generated a point mutant of ZEBRA, Z(S186A), that was not impaired in its ability to activate transcription; however, this mutation abolished its ability to initiate the viral lytic cascade. The mutant, containing a serine-to-alanine substitution in the DNA-binding domain of the protein, bound to several known ZEBRA-binding sites and activated transcription from reporters bearing known ZEBRA-responsive promoters but did not disrupt latency in EBV-infected cell lines. Therefore, initiation of the EBV lytic cycle by the ZEBRA protein requires a function in addition to transcriptional activation; a change of serine 186 to alanine in the DNA-binding domain of ZEBRA abolished this additional function and uncovered a new role for the ZEBRA protein in disruption of EBV latency. The additional function that is required for initiation of the lytic viral life cycle is likely to require phosphorylation of serine 186 of the ZEBRA protein, which may influence either DNA recognition or transcriptional activation of lytic viral promoters in a chromatinized viral episome.
The ZEBRA protein mediates the switch between the latent and lytic life cycles of Epstein-Barr virus. Z(S186A), a point mutant in ZEBRA’s basic domain in which serine 186 is changed to alanine, is unable to induce expression of lytic cycle mRNAs or proteins from the latent EBV genome even though it retains the ability to activate transcription from reporters bearing known ZEBRA-responsive promoters (A. L. Francis et al., J. Virol. 71:3054–3061, 1997). We now describe three distinct phenotypes of ZEBRA mutants bearing different amino acid substitutions at S186. These phenotypes are based on the capacity of the mutants to activate expression of the BRLF1 and BMRF1 genes, which are targets of ZEBRA’s action, and to synergize with the BRLF1 gene product Rta (R transactivator) in activating expression of downstream genes. One mutant class, represented by Z(S186T), was similar to the wild type, although reduced in the capacity to activate BRLF1 and BMRF1 early lytic cycle genes from the latent virus. A second class, represented by Z(S186C) and Z(S186G), was impaired in transcriptional activation, unable to activate early lytic cycle products from the latent virus, and not rescued by overexpression of Rta. A third class, Z(S186A), although unable by itself to activate BRLF1 or other lytic cycle genes, synergized with Rta. Rta rescued the capacity of Z(S186A) to activate the BMRF1 early lytic cycle gene from the latent virus. All mutant classes bound to DNA in vitro, although their capacity to bind to different ZEBRA response elements varied. Serine 186 of ZEBRA is a critical residue that is required for the distinct activities of induction of BRLF1 expression and for synergy with Rta. Since only Z(S186T) among the mutants behaved similarly to the wild type, activation of BRLF1 likely requires phosphorylation of S186. However, since Z(S186A) could synergize with Rta, synergy with Rta does not appear to be dependent on phosphorylation of S186. S186 likely mediates DNA recognition on the BRLF1 promoter in the context of the latent virus, protein-protein interactions, or both. The Z(S186) mutants define the amino acid side chains required for these functions.
The role of growth factors in controlling the development of glial cells in both the peripheral and central nervous systems has been investigated for a number of years. The recent discovery of a new family of growth factors termed the neuregulins (NRGs) has led to an explosion of information concerning the putative role of these growth factors in the development of Schwann cells (SC), oligodendrocytes (OLG), and astrocytes. Many of these previous studies have focused on the effects of exogenous NRGs on glial cell development and differentiation. We now review the evidence that these glial cells themselves produce NRGs and discuss the major implications of these findings with respect to glial cell development and diseases which affect glial cell function. We also discuss the potential role of endogenous NRGs following neural injury.
Neuregulins (NRGs) are a family of growth factors involved in signaling between neurons and glial cells of the peripheral and central nervous system. NRGs are synthesized and secreted by a number of cell types including Schwann cells, neurons, and oligodendrocytes. NRG transduction signals are mediated by the erbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases. These NRGs may be important for paracrine or autocrine signaling during development, injury, and the normal functioning of the central nervous system. In this study, we characterize the NRGs and erbB receptors expressed by cultured neonatal rat astrocytes. Using immunoblotting protocols with pan-specific antibodies, we identified eleven NRG molecular weight isoforms from approximately 16 kDa to 105 kDa in cultured neonatal rat astrocytes. Immunocyotchemistry with isoform-specific antibodies revealed the expression of both major isoform families (NRGalpha, NRGbeta). Additionally, astrocyte-conditioned media contained two molecular weight isoforms of NRGs. We detected mRNA expression of NRGalpha and NRGbeta in astrocytes by amplifying mRNA transcripts with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Furthermore, we confirm that cultured astrocytes express all four erbB receptors as detected by immunocytochemical and immunoblotting techniques. These data indicate that astrocytes contain and secrete NRGs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.