I comment on Horner's and Sugai's article regarding the lessons learned from implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support (PBIS)-that is, the things to consider when attempting to extend other works in behavior analysis to the likes of mainstream society. In adopting a critical eye toward the PBIS model, I comment first on the need for dissemination of behavioral principles to a public audience, and then outline the suggestions made by the authors for enhancing acceptance across disciplines. I clarify the definition of PBIS presented by the authors, and summarize the benefits and drawbacks associated with the conceptual argument surrounding the contention that PBIS is a behavior analytic approach to system-wide change, and argue instead for the distinction of elements in the PBIS model and their respective empirical effectiveness. I refer to other works in behavior analysis that are relevant to the current discussion and offer additional considerations for behavior analysts interested in forging ahead with endeavors that aim increase dissemination, particularly those that incorporate a culmination of alternative professional practices.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The current study investigated the effects of monetary contingencies on the performance of experienced golfers in the natural setting. Utilizing a multi-element design reversal design counter balanced across tasks, investigators exposed participants to contingencies involving the ability to earn or lose money, based on performance. Results yielded a significant detriment to performance when monetary contingencies were implemented for non-professional golfers. Contrasting results in the performance of one professional golfer yielded no significant difference in performance across conditions. Results suggest that monetary wagers affect performance, and furthermore, that performance of amateur players may be more easily influenced by such contingencies.