Objectives This study sought to determine if bupivacaine targeted at specific, potentially painful sites could enhance postoperative analgesia in routine feline ovariohysterectomies. A secondary objective was to assess the utility of multiple acute pain scales for cats in a high-volume surgery setting. Methods Two hundred and twelve cats were included in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Anesthesia included buprenorphine, ketamine, dexmedetomidine and isoflurane. A ventral midline ovariohysterectomy was performed and cats were administered bupivacaine (2 mg/kg), placebo control (0.9% saline) or sham control (observation only) intraoperatively at the ovarian suspensory ligaments and vessels, uterine body and incisional subcutaneous tissues. Two pain scales were used to assess cats postoperatively. Initially, a multidimensional composite pain scale (MCPS) and a 0–10 numeric pain rating scale (NRS) were used. Subsequently, the MCPS was replaced with a modified Colorado State University Feline Acute Pain Scale (mCSU). Pain scores for the test groups were compared using a one-way ANOVA and a Holm–Bonferroni post hoc analysis when a difference was found ( P <0.05). Results Pain for the bupivacaine group was lower than the control groups at 1 h post-recovery and discharge, attaining significance with higher body weights. The P values were 0.008 and 0.004 for 1 h post-recovery and discharge, respectively. Pain scores between evaluators for the MCPS and NRS correlated poorly with r values for 1 h post-recovery and discharge of −0.08 and 0.22, respectively. Additionally, the MCPS proved difficult to use and time consuming, especially for feral and fractious patients, and was replaced with the mCSU. Conclusions and relevance Targeted bupivacaine reduced early postoperative pain scores following routine feline ovariohysterectomies. The technique used was simple, requiring just over a minute to perform at minimal additional cost. The MCPS was not ideal for use in a high-volume spay setting.

Objectives The aims of this study were to determine if there is increased risk of intraoperative bleeding in pregnant cats undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy (OHE), and to compare coagulation in queens in various stages of estrus and pregnancy subjected to elective OHE using a whole-blood viscoelastic assay. Methods Intraoperative blood loss was compared between non-pregnant and pregnant cats undergoing elective OHE. Viscoelastic evaluations of whole blood drawn pre- and postoperatively were performed using a point-of-care device measuring clot time (CT), clot formation time (CFT), alpha angle, maximum clot formation (MCF), amplitude at 10 and 20 mins (A10 and A20, respectively), and lysis index at 30 and 45 mins after MCF (LI30 and LI45, respectively). Results One hundred and ninety-three cats underwent OHE by a ventral midline approach. Median blood loss was greater for pregnant cats (2.0 ml, range <0.5–13 ml) than non-pregnant cats (<0.5 ml, range <0.5–15 ml; P <0.0001). Preoperatively, pregnant cats had a shorter median CFT (165 s vs 190.5 s), increased median A10 (31 from 25.5 VCM units) and A20 (38 from 35 VCM units), and a lower median LI45 (99% from 100%) than non-pregnant cats. Postoperatively, A10 and A20 increased, and LI30 and LI45 decreased in both non-pregnant and pregnant queens. In pregnant queens, mean CT also increased postoperatively. Conclusions and relevance Pregnant cats were relatively hypercoagulable and had an increased rate of clot lysis than non-pregnant cats. Intraoperative blood loss was increased in pregnant vs non-pregnant cats, but no clinically relevant bleeding conditions occurred.