Bladder symptoms such as urinary urgency, frequency, and incontinence are common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). These symptoms, which often result from neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO), can have a major impact on patients' day-to-day lives. However, in many cases they are over-looked in the clinical management of MS. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a reliable, sensitive, and specific screening tool for patients with bladder problems related to MS. We performed a literature review and then conducted a content validation study followed by a multisite observational study of a new screening tool, the Actionable Bladder Symptom Screening Tool (ABSST). All ABSST domains as well as the total score met the threshold for good internal consistency (Cronbach α ≥ 0.70), with a Cronbach α value of 0.95 for the total score and values ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 for the three domains. The validity of the ABSST was demonstrated by high correlation of the domains and total score with the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF) Symptom Severity and Total Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) scores (Spearman correlation coefficient ≥ 0.782). The predictive validity of the ABSST total score to identify patients who might receive a recommendation to see a urologist was strong. This new instrument, which was developed with input from clinicians as well as MS patients, meets the current content validity and psychometric testing thresholds established by the US Food and Drug Administration, with high sensitivity and specificity.
Numerous preclinical studies have demonstrated that posttraumatic treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI) with thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) or TRH analogs improves long-term behavioral recovery. The purpose of the present study is to provide preliminary data regarding the safety and potential efficacy of TRH in patients with acute SCI. A total of 20 patients with SCI were classified by clinical examination into complete and incomplete injury groups within 12 h of trauma and randomly assigned in double-blinded fashion to treatment with either TRH (0.2 mg/kg intravenous bolus followed by 0.2 mg/kg/h infusion over 6 h) or vehicle (equal volume physiological saline) placebo. A variety of physiological variables were followed during treatment. Clinical examination included motor and sensory testing, as well as assigning a Sunnybrook score based upon level of function. Patients were examined at 24 h, 72 h, 1 week, 1 month, 4 months, and 12 months after injury. TRH infusions were well tolerated. There appeared to be no discernible treatment effect in patients with complete injuries although data were available from only six such patients at 4 months. For the incomplete injury group, a total of 6 treated and 5 placebo patients had 4-month evaluations. TRH treatment was associated with significantly higher motor, sensory, and Sunnybrook scores than placebo treatment. Because of patients lost to subsequent follow-up, 12-month data were not highly informative. These observations must be interpreted with considerable caution because of the small patient numbers, but together with extensive animal studies they support the need for a larger multicenter clinical trial of TRH.
These data provide evidence that branded GA exposure during pregnancy seems safe, without teratogenic effect.
BackgroundThe majority of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients develop some form of lower urinary tract dysfunction, usually as a result of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). Patients identify urinary incontinence as one of the worst aspects of this disease. Despite the high prevalence of NDO, urological evaluation and treatment are significantly under-accessed in this population. The objectives of this study were: 1) to adapt the previously validated Actionable Bladder Symptom Screening Tool (ABSST) to a short form for ease and brevity of application in a clinical setting that is clinically meaningful; and 2) to develop a scoring algorithm that would be interpretable in terms of referring/considering precise diagnosis and treatment.MethodsA US-based, non-randomized, multi-center, stand-alone observational study was conducted to assess the psychometric properties of the ABSST among patients who have MS with and without NDO. Mixed psychometric methods (e.g., classical statistics (Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994) and item response methods (Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 2001)) were used to evaluate the predictive and clinical validity of the shortened form. The latter included clinicians flagging clinically meaningful items and associated response options which would indicate the need for further evaluation or treatment.ResultsA total of 151 patients, all with MS and with and without NDO, were recruited by 28 clinicians in various US geographical locations. Approximately 41% of patients reported a history of or currently having urinary incontinence and/or urinary urgency. The prediction model across the entire range of classification thresholds was evaluated, plotting the true positive identification rate against the false positive rate (1-Specificity) for various cut scores. In this study, the cut-point or total score of greater than or equal to 6 had a sensitivity of approximately 85%, and specificity of approximately 93% (i.e., 85% patients would warrant being referred to a urologist and 93% of the patients whose symptoms would not warrant urologist referral).ConclusionsOverall the short form ABSST demonstrated sensitivity and specificity as it maintained the integrity of the longer form tool. Concurrent validity for each subscale as well as predictive and concurrent validity of the total shortened instrument was demonstrated. This instrument provides a new method for assessing bladder problems among MS patients, and may facilitate earlier and more precise diagnosis, treatment, and/or referral to a specialist.
Fingolimod, a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator, is the first oral treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this review was to provide a concise, comprehensive overview of the clinically relevant mechanism of action, efficacy and safety information available for fingolimod. Key data were derived from two international, Phase III, double-blind, randomised trials (TRANSFORMS and FREEDOMS) performed over 12 and 24 months, respectively, which evaluated fingolimod 0.5 and 1.25 mg daily in 1703 patients with relapsing forms of MS. In TRANSFORMS, there was a 52% reduction in the annualised relapse rate (ARR) with fingolimod 0.5 mg vs. 30 μg intramuscular interferon beta-1a (0.16 vs. 0.33; p < 0.001) at 1 year. In FREEDOMS, there was a 55% decrease in ARR at 2 years with fingolimod 0.5 mg vs. placebo (0.18 vs. 0.40; p < 0.001). Risk of disability progression, confirmed at 3 months, was also reduced by 30% over the 2-year study period with fingolimod vs. placebo (p = 0.02). Significantly fewer new or enlarged lesions on T(2) -weighted images were seen in both studies (TRANSFORMS, p = 0.002 vs. interferon beta-1a at 1 year; FREEDOMS, p < 0.001 vs. placebo at 2 years). Overall, fingolimod 0.5 mg was well tolerated by patients. Transient, generally asymptomatic bradycardia and infrequent atrioventricular block were seen with the administration of the first dose. Macular oedema and serious infections occurred infrequently. Reversible, asymptomatic elevations of liver enzymes could also occur. As the first approved oral disease-modifying treatment, fingolimod offers patients a convenient alternative to regular self-injection for the treatment of relapsing forms of MS. In addition to high efficacy with a relatively acceptable safety profile, fingolimod provides a therapy with a new mechanism of action.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.