PurposeTo provide practice recommendations for genetic counselors whose clients are considering cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier testing or seeking information regarding CF molecular test results. The goals of these recommendations are to: 1) Provide updated information about the natural history, diagnosis, and treatment of CF and related conditions. 2) Supplement genetic counselors’ knowledge and understanding of the available carrier screening and diagnostic testing options. 3) Describe the current state of genotype/phenotype correlations for CFTR mutations and an approach to interpreting both novel and previously described variants. 4) Provide a framework for genetic counselors to assist clients’ decision‐making regarding CF carrier testing, prenatal diagnosis, and pregnancy management.Disclaimer The practice guidelines of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) are developed by members of the NSGC to assist genetic counselors and other health care providers in making decisions about appropriate management of genetic concerns; including access to and/or delivery of services. Each practice guideline focuses on a clinical or practice‐based issue, and is the result of a review and analysis of current professional literature believed to be reliable. As such, information and recommendations within the NSGC practice guidelines reflect the current scientific and clinical knowledge at the time of publication, are only current as of their publication date, and are subject to change without notice as advances emerge.In addition, variations in practice, which take into account the needs of the individual patient and the resources and limitations unique to the institution or type of practice, may warrant approaches, treatments and/or procedures that differ from the recommendations outlined in this guideline. Therefore, these recommendations should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of management, nor does the use of such recommendations guarantee a particular outcome. Genetic counseling practice guidelines are never intended to displace a health care provider's best medical judgment based on the clinical circumstances of a particular patient or patient population.Practice guidelines are published by NSGC for educational and informational purposes only, and NSGC does not “approve” or “endorse” any specific methods, practices, or sources of information.

Genetic counseling for cystic fibrosis (CF) is challenged by intricate molecular mechanisms, complex phenotypes, and psychosocial needs. CFTR variant interpretation has become critical; this manuscript examines variant nomenclature and classes, as well as opportunities and challenges posed by genetic technologies and genotypedirected therapies. With postgraduate training in medical genetics and counseling, genetic counselors educate patients and families, facilitate testing and interpretation, and help integrate genetic information into diagnosis and treatment. They support families, ranging from carrier couples or new parents, to children understanding their disease, to adults with CF contemplating reproduction. The changing face of CF increasingly highlights the critical importance of genetic information to patients and their families. Genetic counselors are uniquely poised to translate this information in diagnostics and personalized care. Genetic counselors straddle molecular and clinical realms, helping patients adapt, plan, and gain access to appropriate therapies.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common life-limiting recessive genetic disorder in the white population. CF is caused by abnormalities in the gene that codes for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein (CFTR) and may result in severe chronic lung disease, poor growth, and malnutrition. Physicians often do not consider CF in the differential diagnosis of an infant with failure to thrive in the presence of a negative newborn screening (NBS) result. In Minnesota, newborn infants are screened for CF by immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) testing followed by DNA analysis if the IRT screen result is abnormal. All positive NBS results are followed by confirmatory sweat-testing by pilocarpine iontophoresis. We present here the case of a 1-month-old white boy with failure to thrive, chronic diarrhea, and severe malnutrition. Minnesota state CF NBS results were negative at birth (IRT: 43 ng/mL [96% cutoff value: 52 ng/mL]). Clinical symptoms resulted in sweat-testing by Gibson-Cooke pilocarpine iontophoresis at 1 month of age, and the result was positive (102 mmol Cl(-)/L [normal: ≤30 mmol Cl(-)/L]). CFTR mutation analysis confirmed a homozygous f508del genotype, and stool pancreatic elastase testing revealed severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. This case represents the first known false-negative result in Minnesota since the initiation of NBS for CF in 2006, which illustrates the importance of considering CF in the evaluation of an infant with failure to thrive and symptoms of malabsorption, regardless of NBS results.

No abstract