BACKGROUND Ibrutinib is an irreversible inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) and is effective in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Resistance to irreversible kinase inhibitors and resistance associated with BTK inhibition have not been characterized. Although only a small proportion of patients have had a relapse during ibrutinib therapy, an understanding of resistance mechanisms is important. We evaluated patients with relapsed disease to identify mutations that may mediate ibrutinib resistance. METHODS We performed whole-exome sequencing at baseline and the time of relapse on samples from six patients with acquired resistance to ibrutinib therapy. We then performed functional analysis of identified mutations. In addition, we performed Ion Torrent sequencing for identified resistance mutations on samples from nine patients with prolonged lymphocytosis. RESULTS We identified a cysteine-to-serine mutation in BTK at the binding site of ibrutinib in five patients and identified three distinct mutations in PLCγ2 in two patients. Functional analysis showed that the C481S mutation of BTK results in a protein that is only reversibly inhibited by ibrutinib. The R665W and L845F mutations in PLCγ2 are both potentially gain-of-function mutations that lead to autonomous B-cell–receptor activity. These mutations were not found in any of the patients with prolonged lymphocytosis who were taking ibrutinib. CONCLUSIONS Resistance to the irreversible BTK inhibitor ibrutinib often involves mutation of a cysteine residue where ibrutinib binding occurs. This finding, combined with two additional mutations in PLCγ2 that are immediately downstream of BTK, underscores the importance of the B-cell–receptor pathway in the mechanism of action of ibrutinib in CLL. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others.)

BACKGROUND Ibrutinib has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) since 2016 but has not been compared with chemoimmunotherapy. We conducted a phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy of ibrutinib, either alone or in combination with rituximab, relative to chemoimmunotherapy. METHODS Patients 65 years of age or older who had untreated CLL were randomly assigned to receive bendamustine plus rituximab, ibrutinib, or ibrutinib plus rituximab. The primary end point was progression-free survival. The Alliance Data and Safety Monitoring Board made the decision to release the data after the protocol-specified efficacy threshold had been met. RESULTS A total of 183 patients were assigned to receive bendamustine plus rituximab, 182 to receive ibrutinib, and 182 to receive ibrutinib plus rituximab. Median progression-free survival was reached only with bendamustine plus rituximab. The estimated percentage of patients with progression-free survival at 2 years was 74% with bendamustine plus rituximab and was higher with ibrutinib alone (87%; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.58; P<0.001) and with ibrutinib plus rituximab (88%; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.59; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the ibrutinib-plus-rituximab group and the ibrutinib group with regard to progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.62; P=0.49). With a median follow-up of 38 months, there was no significant difference among the three treatment groups with regard to overall survival. The rate of grade 3, 4, or 5 hematologic adverse events was higher with bendamustine plus rituximab (61%) than with ibrutinib or ibrutinib plus rituximab (41% and 39%, respectively), whereas the rate of grade 3, 4, or 5 nonhematologic adverse events was lower with bendamustine plus rituximab (63%) than with the ibrutinib-containing regimens (74% with each regimen). CONCLUSIONS Among older patients with untreated CLL, treatment with ibrutinib was superior to treatment with bendamustine plus rituximab with regard to progression-free survival. There was no significant difference between ibrutinib and ibrutinib plus rituximab with regard to progression-free survival. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and Pharmacyclics; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01886872.)

Importance The Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor ibrutinib is effective in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Reasons for discontinuation from this drug and outcomes following discontinuation have not been evaluated outside of clinical trials with relatively short follow-up. Objective To determine features associated with discontinuation of ibrutinib and outcomes. Design 308 patients participating in four sequential trials of ibrutinib were included. These trials accrued patients included in this analysis from May 2010 until April 2014, and data were locked in June 2014. Setting The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Participants Patients with CLL enrolled on 4 sequential clinical trials. Main Outcome Measure Patients were evaluated for time to discontinuation, reasons for discontinuation, and survival following discontinuation. For patients who discontinued due to progression, targeted deep sequencing was performed in samples at baseline and relapse. Results With a median follow-up of 20 months, 232 patients remain on therapy, 31 have discontinued because of progression, and 45 have discontinued for other reasons. Disease progression includes Richter’s transformation or progressive CLL. Richter’s appeared to occur early and CLL progressions later (cumulative incidence at 12 months: 4.5% (95% CI: 2.0% to 7.0%) and 0.3% (95% CI: 0% to 1.0%), respectively). Median survival following Richter’s transformation was 3.5 months (95% CI: 0.3–6.0), and 17.6 months (95% CI: 4.7-not reached) following CLL progression. Sequencing on peripheral blood from 8 patients with Richter’s transformation revealed 2 with mutations in BTK, and a lymph node sample showed no mutations in BTK or PLCγ2. Deep sequencing on 11 patients with CLL progression revealed BTK or PLCγ2 mutations in all. These mutations were not identified pre-treatment in any patient. Conclusions and Relevance This single institution experience with ibrutinib confirms it to be an effective therapy and identifies, for the first time, baseline factors associated with ibrutinib discontinuation. Outcomes data show poor prognosis after discontinuation, especially for those patients with Richter’s transformation. Finally, sequencing data confirm initial reports associating mutations in BTK and PLCγ2 with progression and clearly show that CLL progressions are associated with these mutations, while Richter’s transformation is likely not.

We report for the first time that mutKIT, and particularly mutKIT17, confer higher relapse risk, and both mutKIT17 and mutKIT8 appear to adversely affect OS in AML with inv(16). We also confirm the adverse impact of mutKIT on relapse risk in t(8;21) AML. We suggest that patients with core-binding factor AML should be screened for mutKIT at diagnosis for both prognostic and therapeutic purposes, given that activated KIT potentially can be targeted with novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors.