Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) includes intrauterine devices (IUDs) and the subdermal implant. These methods are the most effective reversible methods of contraception, and have the additional advantages of being long-lasting, convenient, well liked by users and cost effective. Compared with other user-dependent methods that increase the risk of noncompliance-related method failure, LARC methods can bring ‘typical use’ failure rates more in line with ‘perfect use’ failure rates. LARC methods are ‘forgettable’; they are not dependent on compliance with a pill-taking regimen, remembering to change a patch or ring, or coming back to the clinician for an injection. LARC method failure rates rival that of tubal sterilization at <1% for IUDs and the subdermal implant. For these reasons, we believe that IUDs and implants should be offered as first-line contraception for most women. This article provides a review of the LARC methods that are currently available in the US, including their effectiveness, advantages, disadvantages and contraindications. Additionally, we dispel myths and misconceptions regarding IUDs, and address the barriers to LARC use.
Mucus hyperproduction in asthma results from Th2-induced airway inflammation. Controversy exists about the precise mechanism of this Th2 effect. Although we showed that mucus can be induced by Th2 cells in the absence of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, eosinophils, and mast cells, but not without IL-4Ralpha signaling, others demonstrated that IL-4 and IL-9 can directly stimulate airway epithelial mucus. Using a system in which in vitro-generated T cell receptor transgenic Th2 cells are transferred into recipient mice and activated in the respiratory tract with inhaled antigen, we now show that CD4 Th cells can stimulate mucus only through a common, IL-13-mediated pathway. All Th cytokines depend on IL-13 for this effect and IL-13 acts, not through intermediate inflammatory cells, but on structural cells within the lung, likely the airway epithelium itself. The potency of IL-13 is shown, requiring its complete blockade for a significant reduction in mucus production. We show that mucus induction by Th2 cells does not require nuclear factor-kappaB, unlike mucins induced by gram-negative infection. These studies define in vivo pathways that lead to mucus induction and indicate that, whereas IL-13 mediates a dominant pathway for CD4 Th induced inflammation, other inflammatory stimuli activate the epithelium to produce mucus by different pathways.
A prophylactic vaccine for HIV-1 will probably require the induction and maintenance of both humoral and cellular immunity. One current strategy to achieve such long term immune responses is a prime-boost vaccination approach using a DNA priming inoculation, followed by recombinant viral boost. In this report we use a novel prime-boost approach in which the priming injections consist of recombinant HIV-1 Gag protein mixed with cytosine phosphate guanosine oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG ODN), followed by recombinant adenoviral boost expressing HIV-1 Gag. Analysis of the immune responses indicates that HIV-1 Gag protein plus CpG ODN immunization alone induces potent humoral as well as Th1 and CD8+ T cell responses. Boosting with recombinant adenovirus strikingly enhances CD8+, but not Th1, T cell responses, resulting in CD8+ T cell responses far greater in magnitude than Th1 responses. Furthermore, the Th1 and CD8+ T cell responses following prime-boost immunization were seen in both lymphoid and peripheral mucosal organs and were sustained over several months. Together, these data suggest a new immunization approach for elicitation of long term humoral and cellular immune responses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.