The success rate of voice rehabilitation with VP was 94%. In primary TEP, the success rate was 97%, whereas in secondary TEP it was 78%; 2 years later, it was 96% and 75%, respectively. A tendency for a higher success rate in voice rehabilitation after TL was observed in primary TEP. The use of xRT and age of patient had no influence on the success rate.

A disfonia tem recebido um enfoque ocupacional crescente e torna-se necessário, ao otorrinolaringologista, atualizar a abordagem clínica dos trabalhadores que usam a voz como instrumento de trabalho, onde novas catagorias profissionais têm surgido e, com elas, as disfunções vocais conseqüentes às condições de trabalho. Hoje, há grandes preocupações com o prejuízo econômico e produtivo que o ditúrbio vocal possa gerar. Sabe-se que a disfunção vocal tem como característica a multicausalidade e, por isso, a avaliação, conclusão e emissão de relatórios médicos tornam-se incertos. Objetivo: Para melhor avaliar estes profissionais e garantir um atendimento com respaldo científico adequado, estabeleceu-se um protocolo multidisciplinar, que consiste em anamnese dirigida, exame físico, endoscopia laríngea, análise perceptiva da voz e aplicação do Voice Handicap Index (VHI). Forma de estudo: Coorte histó-rica transversal. Material e método: Para testar o uso do méto-do, em caráter preliminar, o protocolo foi aplicado em 15 profissionais que usavam a voz para trabalhar. Então, realizou-se um estudo retrospectivo com estes pacientes. Resultado: Demonstrou-se que 13,3% dos profissionais apresentaram performance vocal normal; 33,3%, disfonia funcional e 46%, disfonia orgânico-funcional. A disfunção vocal foi relacionada ao exercício do trabalho em 40% dos pacientes e em 46,6% ela foi descartada. Conclusão: Concluiu-se que o método é suficientemente abrangente e pode ser de utilidade ao otorrinolaringologista, para a avaliação clínico-ocupacional deste grupo de pacientes. Dysphoni a has an occupational view nowadays. A shift in the voice-oriented professional's clinical approach has been required. New voice-oriented job categories have emerged and, as a result, the voice disorder in the professional enviroment has increased. The economic and productivity harm due to voice disorders are a preocupation. Dysphonia has multiple causes and its evaluation, ethiological conclusion and occupational reports aren't defined yet. Aim: In order to obtain a more accurate and comprehensive evaluation, a multidisciplinary protocol was elaborated to ensure proper medical scientific support. It consists of anamnesis, physical exam, laryngeal endoscopy, perceptive voice analysis and Voice Handicap Index application (VHI). Study design: Transversal historic cohort. Material e método: In this preliminary study, the protocol was applied on 15 voice professionals with dysphonia. Results: 13,3% with normal voice performance; 33,3% with functional dysphonia; 46% with organic dysphonia. Dysphonia was related to the voice-oriented job in 40% cases and it was ruled out in 46,6%. Conclusion: We concluded that the protocol is complete enough to help otolaryngologists evaluate this workers' category. EricaPalavras-chave: disfonia, ocupacional, multidisciplinar.

Dysphoni a may impair the quality of communication and social relations of people, thereby directly affecting quality of life. It is common knowledge amongst professionals involved with the treatment of voice disorders the need for objective protocols to evaluate voice quality and measure its impact on the individual's quality of life. Aim: To associate life quality with the degree of dysphonia and professional voice use in a group of dysphonic patients. Materials and Methods: A prospective clinical study was undertaken with a group of dysphonic patients using an internationally validated voicerelated quality-of-life protocol. A statistical analysis of the results was carried out, not distinguishing between those who use their voices professionally and those who don't. Results: dysphonia had an impact on the quality of life of all patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups -professional users and non-users of their voices; however, considering the groups separately, this correlation was significant only in the group of patients who do not use their voices professionally. Conclusion: Dysphonia affected the quality of life of all subjects regardless of their voice use.

Dysphonia affected the quality of life of all subjects regardless of their voice use.