BackgroundRehabilitation in subjects with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia has been widely recommended. However, data regarding the starting time of rehabilitation, subjects and healthcare workers’ safety, as well as rehabilitation program features are limited. We aimed to assess the safety and characterize the effect of early and non-early physiotherapy on severe COVID-19 pneumonia subjects.MethodsA retrospective cohort study, including a consecutive sample of surviving subjects admitted to an acute care hospital due to severe COVID-19 pneumonia from March 13th to May 15th of 2020, is made. Subjects were separated into three groups: non-physical therapy, early physiotherapy (onset <7 days of admission), and non-early physiotherapy. Subject and therapist safety and length of hospital stay were the main evaluated outcomes.ResultsA total of 159 subjects were included (72% men; median age 62 years). Rehabilitation was performed on 108 subjects (32 early and 76 non-early physiotherapies). The length of hospital stay was 19 [interquartile range (IQR) 36.25] and 34 days (IQR 27.25) (p = 0.001) for early and non-early physiotherapy groups, respectively. No physiotherapist was infected and no subject adverse effect was identified. Multivariate analysis of subjects receiving physiotherapy during admission identified obesity [odds ratio (OR) 3.21; p-value 0.028], invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 6.25; p-value <0.001), and non-early physiotherapy (OR 3.54; p-value 0.017) as independent factors associated with a higher risk of prolonged hospital stay. Survivors’ follow-up after hospital discharge at 8 weeks was completed by 54% of subjects.ConclusionRehabilitation in acute severe COVID-19 pneumonia is safe for subjects and healthcare workers and could reduce the length of hospitalization stay, especially in those that may start early.

INTRODUCTION: The Objective was to investigate the incidence of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment and to analyze the risk factors involved in a tertiary level hospital. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal observational study over 3 years post-breast surgery. 232 patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer at our institution between September 2013 and February 2018. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) were mandatory in this cohort. In total, 201 patients met the inclusion criteria and had a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 1–54 months). Lymphedema was diagnosed by circumferential measurements and truncated cone calculations. Patients and tumor characteristics, shoulder range of motion limitation and local and systemic therapies were analyzed as possible risk factors for lymphedema. RESULTS: Most cases of lymphedema appeared in the first 2 years. 13.9% of patients developed lymphedema: 31% after ALND and 4.6% after SLNB (p < 0.01), and 46.7% after mastectomy and 11.3% after breast-conserving surgery (p < 0.01). The lymphedema rate increased when axillary radiotherapy (RT) was added to radical surgery: 4.3% for SLNB alone, 6.7% for SLNB + RT, 17.6% for ALND alone, and 35.2% for ALND + RT (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, the only risk factors associated with the development of lymphedema were ALND and mastectomy, which had hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 7.28 (2.92–18.16) and 3.9 (1.60–9.49) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The main risk factors for lymphedema were the more radical surgeries (ALND and mastectomy). The risk associated with these procedures appeared to be worsened by the addition of axillary radiotherapy. A follow-up protocol in patients with ALND lasting at least two years, in which special attention is paid to these risk factors, is necessary to guarantee a comprehensive control of lymphedema that provides early detection and treatment.