Prevalence and reasons for using electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) was examined among patients enrolled in 24 substance abuse treatment centers in the United States (N=1,113). Prevalence of e-cigarette use was assessed for the full sample. Bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify characteristics associated with e-cigarette use among current cigarette smokers (the majority of e-cigarette users). Overall 55.5% of the sample reported lifetime use of e-cigarettes, and 30.5% reported using e-cigarettes in the past 30 days (current users). The main reasons for using e-cigarettes were (a) at times/places when smoking was prohibited (53.5%), and (b) as a way to quit/reduce cigarette smoking (50.3%). Daily vs non-daily e-cigarette users were more likely to use e-cigarettes both as a way to reduce health risks, and as a way to quit/reduce cigarette smoking. A majority of e-cigarette users (87.1%) reported dual use of e-cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes during the past month. Among current cigarette smokers, those that also used e-cigarettes smoked more cigarettes per day, were more likely to have made a past year cigarette quit attempt, and to have tried nicotine replacement therapy compared to cigarette only smokers. There was a high rate of dual e-cigarette and cigarette use by persons enrolled in addiction treatment. E-cigarette users may be heavier cigarette smokers trying to quit or reduce their cigarette smoking. However, e-cigarettes were also used at times when individuals could not smoke cigarettes. Substance abuse treatment centers developing tobacco policies need to consider these potentially conflicting reasons for using e-cigarettes.

Background Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, highly aggressive malignancy which lacks high-level evidence-based treatment guidelines.Methods To determine outcomes of MCC patients and assess the role of radiation in treatment, we performed a retrospective chart review of patients treated for MCC between2006 and 2016 at a single high-volume academic medical center. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) for the entire population and for those populations receiving specific therapies. Results Forty-two patients were evaluable. OS for all patients was not reached since most remain alive at time of analysis. OS for the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I was not reached. OS for stages II, III, and IV was 37.3 months (6.8, -), 49.5 months (14.2, 49.5), and 14.5 months (10.8, -), respectively. OS could not be reached in the high radiotherapy (RT) dose group (biologically equivalent dose [BED] ≥ 60) and was 49.5 months (10.8, -) in the low-dose group (BED < 60). For surgical margin status, OS was 14.9158 months (6.8008, -) for positive margins and 37.3 months (10.8, -) for negative margins. Conclusions No conclusive findings for OS were identified; however, trends for improved OS were associated with lower AJCC staging, negative surgical margins, and high RT doses.

No abstract