Parkinson's disease (PD) presents several motor signs, including tremor and bradykinesia. However, these signs can also be found in other motor disorders and in neurologically healthy older adults. The incidence of bradykinesia in PD is relatively high in all stages of the disorder, even when compared to tremor. Thus, this research proposes an objective assessment of bradykinesia in patients with PD (G : 15 older adults with Parkinson's disease, 65.3 ± 9.1 years) and older adults (G: 12 healthy older adults, 60.1 ± 6.1 years). The severity of bradykinesia in the participants of G was assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Movement and muscular activity were detected by means of inertial (accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer) and electromyographic sensors while the participants performed wrist extension against gravity with the forearm on pronation. Mean and standard error of inertial and electromyographic signal parameters could discriminate PD patients from healthy older adults (p value<0.05). In discriminating patients with PD from healthy older adults, the mean sensitivity and specificity were respectively 86.67 and 83.33%. The discrimination between the groups, based on the objective evaluation of bradykinesia, may contribute to the accurate diagnosis of PD and to the monitoring of therapies to control parkinsonian bradykinesia, and opens the possibility for further comparative studies considering individuals suffering from other motor disorders.

BackgroundOver the years, a number of distinct treatments have been adopted for the management of the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD), including pharmacologic therapies and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Efficacy is most often evaluated by subjective assessments, which are prone to error and dependent on the experience of the examiner. Our goal was to identify an objective means of assessing response to therapy.MethodsIn this study, we employed objective analyses in order to visualize and identify differences between three groups: healthy control (N = 10), subjects with PD treated with DBS (N = 12), and subjects with PD treated with levodopa (N = 16). Subjects were assessed during execution of three dynamic tasks (finger taps, finger to nose, supination and pronation) and a static task (extended arm with no active movement). Measurements were acquired with two pairs of inertial and electromyographic sensors. Feature extraction was applied to estimate the relevant information from the data after which the high-dimensional feature space was reduced to a two-dimensional space using the nonlinear Sammon’s map. Non-parametric analysis of variance was employed for the verification of relevant statistical differences among the groups (p < 0.05). In addition, K-fold cross-validation for discriminant analysis based on Gaussian Finite Mixture Modeling was employed for data classification.ResultsThe results showed visual and statistical differences for all groups and conditions (i.e., static and dynamic tasks). The employed methods were successful for the discrimination of the groups. Classification accuracy was 81 ± 6% (mean ± standard deviation) and 71 ± 8%, for training and test groups respectively.ConclusionsThis research showed the discrimination between healthy and diseased groups conditions. The methods were also able to discriminate individuals with PD treated with DBS and levodopa. These methods enable objective characterization and visualization of features extracted from inertial and electromyographic sensors for different groups.

No abstract

No abstract