NANOG is an important stem cell transcription factor involved in human development and cancerogenesis. Its expression is complex and regulated on different levels. Moreover, NANOG protein might regulate hundreds of target genes at the same time. NANOG is crucial for preimplantation development phase and progressively decreases during embryonic stem cells differentiation, thus regulating embryonic and fetal development. Postnatally, NANOG is undetectable or expressed in very low amounts in the majority of human tissues. NANOG re-expression can be detected during cancerogenesis, already in precancerous lesions, with increasing levels of NANOG in high grade dysplasia. NANOG is believed to enable cancer cells to obtain stem-cell like properties, which are believed to be the source of expanding growth, tumor maintenance, metastasis formation, and tumor relapse. High NANOG expression in cancer is frequently associated with advanced stage, poor differentiation, worse overall survival, and resistance to treatment, and is therefore a promising prognostic and predictive marker. We summarize the current knowledge on the role of NANOG in cancerogenesis and development, including our own experience. We provide a critical overview of NANOG as a prognostic and diagnostic factor, including problems regarding its regulation and detection. Impact statement NANOG has emerged as a key stem cell transcription factor in normal development and cancerogenesis. It is generally regarded as a good prognostic and predictive factor in various human cancers. It is less known that it is expressed already at precancerous stages in various organs, suggesting that finally an ideal candidate diagnostic marker has been discovered, enabling to distinguish between true dysplasia and reactive atypia. NANOG regulation is complex, and new insights into our understanding of its regulation might provide important information for future development in a broad field of two entirely different processes, i.e. normal development and cancerogenesis, showing how a physiologic mechanism can be used and abused, transforming itself into a key mechanism of disease development and progression.

There is emerging evidence suggesting that epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) play an important role in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), but their exact role remains controversial. Our aim was to analyze the miR-200 family as EMT markers and their target genes expression at invasive tumor front and in nodal and liver metastases. Sixty-three formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 19 patients with CRC were included. Using a micropuncture technique, tissue was obtained from central part and invasive front of the primary tumor, and nodal and liver metastases. Expression of the miR-200 family and their target genes CDKN1B, ONECUT2, PTPN13, RND3, SOX2, TGFB2 and ZEB2 was analyzed using real-time PCR. We found miR-200 family down-regulation at invasive front compared to central part, and up-regulation of miRNA-200a/b/c and miR-429 in metastases compared to invasive front. At invasive front, TGFB2 was the only gene with inverse expression to the miR-200 family, whereas in metastases inverse expression was found for ONECUT2 and SOX2. CDKN1B, PTPN13 and ZEB2 were down-regulated at invasive front and up-regulated in metastases. Our results suggest the involvement of partial EMT at invasive tumor front, and partial MET in metastases in CRC, based on miR-200 family and its target genes expression.

Morphological features including infiltrative growth, tumour budding (TB), and poorly differentiated clusters (PDCs) have a firmly established negative predictive value in colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite extensive research, the mechanisms underlying different tumour growth patterns remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the involvement of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in TB and PDCs in CRC. Using laser-capture microdissection, we obtained distinct parts of the primary CRC including TB, PDCs, expansive tumour front, and the central part of the tumour, and analysed the expression of EMT-related markers, i.e. the miR-200 family, ZEB1/2, RND3, and CDH1. In TB, the miR-200 family and CDH1 were significantly downregulated, while ZEB2 was significantly upregulated. In PDCs, miR-141, miR-200c, and CDH1 were significantly downregulated. No significant differences were observed in the expression of any EMT-related markers between the expansive tumour front and the central part of the tumour. Our results suggest that both TB and PDCs are related to partial EMT. Discrete differences in morphology and expression of EMT-related markers between TB and PDCs indicate that they represent different manifestations of partial EMT. TB seems to be closer to complete EMT than PDCs.

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a pivotal role in carcinogenesis, influencing cancer progression, metastases, stemness, immune evasion, metabolic reprogramming and therapeutic resistance. EMT in most carcinomas, including colorectal carcinoma (CRC), is only partial, and can be evidenced by identification of the underlying molecular drivers and their regulatory molecules. During EMT, cellular reprogramming is orchestrated by core EMT transcription factors (EMT-TFs), namely ZEB1/2, TWIST1/2, SNAI1 (SNAIL) and SNAI2 (SLUG). While microRNAs have been clearly defined as regulators of EMT, the role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in EMT is poorly defined and controversial. Determining the role of lncRNAs in EMT remains a challenge, because they are involved in a number of cellular pathways and are operating through various mechanisms. Adding to the complexity, some lncRNAs have controversial functions across different tumor types, acting as EMT promotors in some tumors and as EMT suppressors in others. The aim of this review is to summarize the role of lncRNAs involved in the regulation of EMT-TFs in human CRC. Additional candidate lncRNAs were identified through a bioinformatics analysis.

Background The aim of this study was to determine the advantages and limitations of two commonly used sampling techniques, i.e., punching tissue block and laser capture microdissection when investigating tumor cell-derived gene expression patterns at the invasive front of colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods We obtained samples from 20 surgically removed CRCs at locations crucial for tumor progression, i.e., the central part, the expansive front and the infiltrative front exhibiting tumor budding, using both sampling techniques. At each location, we separately analyzed the expressions of miR-200 family (miR-141, miR-200a, miR-200b, miR-200c and miR-429), known as reliable markers of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Results We found significant downregulation of all members of miR-200 family at the infiltrative front in comparison to the central part regardless of the used sampling technique. However, when comparing miR-200 expression between the expansive and the infiltrative front, we found significant downregulation of all tested miR-200 at the infiltrative front only in samples obtained by laser capture microdissection. Conclusions Our results suggest that punching tissue block is an adequate technique for studying the differences in tumor gene expression between the central part and the invasive front of CRC, but is insufficient to analyze and compare morphologically distinct patterns along the invasive front including tumor budding. For this purpose, the use of laser capture microdissection is essential.