This qualitative study documents and analyzes COVID-19’s impacts on burn care in twelve nations. Burn care saw valuable improvements in surgical techniques, skin grafting, and other acute treatments during the decades before the COVID-19 pandemic which increased severely burned patients’ survival rates and quality of life. Detailed interviews, conducted in the twelve nations reveal that the COVID-19 pandemic greatly affected the delivery of acute and rehabilitation services for burn patients. Resources have been suctioned away from non-COVID healthcare and burn care has not been spared. Acute, post-acute rehabilitation, and mental health services have all suffered. Weak preparation has deeply burdened health care services in most nations, resulting in lower access to care. Access problems have accelerated innovations like telehealth in many nations. The spread of misinformation through social and traditional media has contributed to the varied responses to COVID-19. This compounded problems in health care delivery. Burn care providers delivered services for survivors during extremely difficult circumstances by continuing to furnish acute and long-term services for patients with complex disease. Emphasis on future pandemic preparedness will be vital because they undermine all aspects of burn care and patient outcomes. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to unfold around the world, it will be important to continue to monitor and analyze the adaptability of nations, health care systems, and burn care providers.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

While remarkable improvements have been made to acute hospital burn care in recent decades, it is not matched by improvements in post-acute care, including physical rehabilitation and mental health. Progress in acute hospital treatment of burn survivors now highlights the next important step—addressing care once a patient leaves intensive treatment and is discharged to the community. Long-term physical rehabilitation and mental health services are vital to improving quality of life for burn survivors. Using qualitative methods, we apply the adapted Reeve framework to assess and compare post-acute physical rehabilitation and mental health care across thirteen countries on six continents. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with burn surgeons and rehabilitation specialists. One major theme that emerged was the importance of training and resources to the quality of post-acute care. This exploratory study suggests the value of investing scarce resources in a range of low-cost interventions to improve follow-up burn care. One intervention identified here is short-term training in post-acute rehabilitation and mental health to upgrade and standardize best clinical practices to address as-yet unmet post-discharge needs of burn survivors.