BackgroundThe daily morning round is a routine activity performed by medical teams. During the morning round, updates on the patient's clinical condition, new laboratory results, and other test results are reviewed and discussed between team members, the patient, and at times the family. Completing these tasks takes time. The design of the patient location differs between hospitals, and significant distance between patients can considerably affect round times. This study assesses physicians' time spent on clinical activities, the distance traveled, and the time they spend walking between patients during daily morning rounds to identify better reorganization methods to reduce wasted time. MethodologyThe survey was self-administered and had no intervention needing ethical approval. The research team's leader engaged two observers (a general practitioner from another department and a general internal medicine department case manager) to collect the data. The general practitioner was a medical graduate doctor, while the bed manager was not a medical college graduate. They observed 10 rounds over 10 nonconsecutive days from July 1 to July 30, 2022. They recorded daily activities during the daily morning round, including time spent with patients, family conversations, bedside education, medication, social issues, and the time and distance required to move from patient to patient and from one location to location. The informal conversations about age, work history, and other small talk were recorded and converted into quantitative data. In each round, records were given to a statistician for rechecking. Subsequently, the records were imported into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet for further statistical analysis. For continuous variables, the data were summarized as mean, median, and standard deviation. For categorical variables, the data were summarized as counts or proportions. ResultsOn average, the duration of the daily morning round was 161.7 ± 17.3 minutes. The average number of patients seen by the general internal medicine round team was 14. The median patient encounter time per patient was 14 minutes (11-19 minutes), with an average of 12 minutes. An average of 8.6 employees participated in the 10-day rounds. The physician spent 41.2% of the time in direct contact with the patient during the morning round, 11.4% in maintaining electronic medical records, and 18.20% in bedside teaching. Additionally, 7.1% of the round time was spent because of interruptions by clinical and nonclinical staff other than team members or family members who were not in the room. Furthermore, a team member walked an average of 763 ± 54.5 m (667-872 m) per round, costing 35.7 minutes (22.1%) of the total round time. ConclusionsThe daily morning round time was significantly longer compared with the reported round times. Relocating patient beds to a common location reduced the rounding time by 22.30%. Disruption, teaching, and medical instruction must also be considered and shortened to reduce the morning round time.

Background and aimThe provision of quality healthcare is initiated by a culture of patient safety. Understanding the patient safety culture (PSC) is a critical concept for all healthcare workers. We conducted this study to evaluate the PSC understanding among the Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC) staff members. Furthermore, to establish a local (HMC) reference point for providing quality health care based on a culture of patient safety. MethodA Hospital Patient Safety Culture Survey (HSOPSC) was presented to our health system employees to assess their perceptions and understandings of PSC. The survey was self-administered. STATA Package version 12.0 culture software was used to analyze these data in terms of descriptive, correlational, and multivariate ordinal regression. ResultsThis study targeted to survey 6,538 employees in HMC facilities, but only 5,583 responded, resulting in a percentage response rate of 85.4%. Ten facilities achieved 100% participation, and other HMC facilities had response rates ranging from 71.2% to 97.5%. Approximately 88.0% of the responders had direct patient contact. The HSOPSC survey resulted in an overall positive response rate of 62.4%. The dimensions with the highest positive response score were "teamwork within the Unit" followed by "organizational learning/continuous improvement" and "management support for patient safety" with a mean percent positive response (PPR) of 83.1%, 82.0%, and 79.2%, respectively. Conversely, there are three dimensions with the lowest positive response score, including "communication openness," "staffing," and "nonpunitive response to errors," with a mean PPR of 46.6%, 40.1%, and 27.7%, respectively. ANOVA and the student ttest revealed that men (64.3% ± 8.1%), employees with 11-15 years of experience in their specialty (65.8% ± 6.5%), and general hospital type (64.4% ±7.2%), were all significantly associated with differences in the overall perceptions of PSC. According to the study results, there was a moderate correlation between perceptions of PSC at the hospital and the following: Teamwork Across Units (RS= 0.43; p < 0.05), and Frequency of Events Reported (RS= 0.40; p < 0.05.). A regression analysis found that men, workers under 40 years of age, professionals with no direct contact with patients, employees with 11-15 years of experience in their specialty, intensive care staff, and general hospital staff were all significant predictors of overall favorable perceptions of the PSC. ConclusionPSC's understanding of HMC staff is moderate. Furthermore, this is the first study conducted for PSC understanding by the HMC staff in Qatar State. It is eligible to be considered a backbone and reference for new research projects about PSC in Qatari health facilities, if not worldwide.