BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare esophageal Doppler cardiac output (COEDM) against the reference method effective pulmonary blood flow cardiac output (COEPBF), for agreement of absolute values and ability to detect change in cardiac output (CO) in pediatric surgical patients. Furthermore, the relationship between these 2 methods and noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) parameters was evaluated. METHODS: Fifteen children American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I and II (median age, 8 months; median weight, 9 kg) scheduled for surgery were investigated in this prospective observational cohort study. Baseline COEPBF/COEDM/NIBP measurements were made at positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 3 cm H2O. PEEP was increased to 10 cm H2O and COEPBF/COEDM/NIBP was recorded after 1 and 3 minutes. PEEP was then lowered to 3 cm H2O, and all measurements were repeated after 3 minutes. Finally, 20-µg kg−1 intravenous atropine was given with the intent to increase CO, and all measurements were recorded again after 5 minutes. Paired recordings of COEDM and COEPBF were examined for agreement and trending ability, and all parameters were analyzed for their responses to the hemodynamic challenges. RESULTS: Bias between COEDM and COEPBF (COEDM − COEPBF) was −17 mL kg−1 min−1 (limits of agreement, −67 to +33 mL kg−1 min−1) with a mean percentage error of 32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25–37) and a concordance rate of 71% (95% CI, 63–80). The hemodynamic interventions caused by PEEP manipulations resulted in significant decrease in COEPBF absolute numbers (155 mL kg−1 min−1 [95% CI, 151–159] to 127 mL kg−1 min−1 [95% CI, 113–141]) and a corresponding relative decrease of 18% (95% CI, 14–22) 3 minutes after application of PEEP 10. No corresponding decreases were detected by COEDM. Mean arterial pressure showed a relative decrease with 5 (95% CI, 2–8) and 6% (95% CI, 2–10) 1 and 3 minutes after the application of PEEP 10, respectively. Systolic arterial pressure showed a relative decrease of 5% (95% CI, 2–10) 3 minutes after application of PEEP 10. None of the recorded parameters responded to atropine administration except for heart rate that showed a 4% relative increase (95% CI, 1–7, P = .02) 5 minutes after atropine. CONCLUSIONS: COEDM was unable to detect the reduction of CO cause by increased PEEP, whereas COEPBF and to a minimal extent NIBP detected these changes in CO. The ability of COEPBF to react to minor reductions in CO, before noticeable changes in NIBP are seen, suggests that COEPBF may be a potentially useful tool for hemodynamic monitoring in mechanically ventilated children.

Mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) is an important variable in anesthesia and intensive care but currently requires pulmonary artery catheterization. Recently, non-invasive determination of SvO2 (Capno-SvO2) using capnodynamics has shown good agreement against CO-oximetry in an animal model of modest hemodynamic changes. The purpose of the current study was to validate Capno-SvO2 against CO-oximetry during major alterations in oxygen delivery. Furthermore, evaluating fiberoptic SvO2 for its response to the same challenges. Eleven mechanically ventilated pigs were exposed to oxygen delivery changes: increased inhaled oxygen concentration, hemorrhage, crystalloid and blood transfusion, preload reduction and dobutamine infusion. Capno-SvO2 and fiberoptic SvO2 recordings were made in parallel with CO-oximetry. Respiratory quotient, needed for capnodynamic SvO2, was measured by analysis of mixed expired gases. Agreement of absolute values between CO-oximetry and Capno-SvO2 and fiberoptic SvO2 respectively, was assessed using Bland–Altman plots. Ability of Capno- SvO2 and fiberoptic SvO2 to detect change compared to CO-oximetry was assessed using concordance analysis. The interventions caused significant hemodynamic variations. Bias between Capno-SvO2 and CO-oximetry was + 3% points (95% limits of agreements – 7 to + 13). Bias between fiberoptic SvO2 and CO-oximetry was + 1% point, (95% limits of agreements − 7 to + 9). Concordance rate for Capno-SvO2 and fiberoptic SvO2 vs. CO-oximetry was 98% and 93%, respectively. Capno-SvO2 generates absolute values close to CO-oximetry. The performance of Capno-SvO2 vs. CO-oximetry was comparable to the performance of fiberoptic SvO2 vs. CO-oximetry. Capno-SvO2 appears to be a promising tool for non-invasive SvO2 monitoring.

The protease inhibitor, ritonavir, is a strong inhibitor of CYP 3A. The drug is used for management of the human immunovirus and is currently part of an oral antiviral drug combination (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir) for the early treatment of SARS-2 COVID-19-positive patients aged 12 years and over who have recognized comorbidities. The CYP 3A enzyme system is responsible for clearance of numerous drugs used in anesthesia (e.g., alfentanil, fentanyl, methadone, rocuronium, bupivacaine, midazolam, ketamine). Ritonavir will have an impact on drug clearances that are dependent on How to cite this article: Svedmyr A, Hack H, Anderson BJ.Interactions of the protease inhibitor, ritonavir, with common anesthesia drugs.