Seventy patients were evaluated after combined intra- and extraarticular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Semitendinosus and gracilis tendons were used for the intraarticular reconstruction and Losee iliotibial band tenodesis for the extraarticular procedure. Minimum followup was 5 years (average, 7). Clinical examination and instrumented ligament examination with the KT-1000 arthrometer and the Cybex II dynamometer were used to evaluate results. Subjectively, patients had no complaints of instability with daily activities; 93% had no complaints of instability with athletic participation. Clinical examination demonstrated that 81% had less than a 1 + Lachman test; 98% had a negative pivot shift. Instrumented examination of the anteroposterior limits of motion revealed that only 57% had less than 3-mm side-to-side difference; 30% had 3- to 5-mm; and 13% had 6- to 9-mm. Mean hamstring muscle strength measured with the Cybex II dynamometer was 94% at 60 and 96% at 100 deg/sec. When evaluated with the Zarins scale, 90% were rated good or excellent, 6% fair, and 4% poor. This reconstructive procedure restores functional, but not necessarily normal, stability in most anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. It allows patients to increase activity levels without significant risk of additional injuries.
This study revealed that preoperative physiologic passive knee HE ≥5° is present in one-third of patients who undergo revision ACLR. HE ≥5° was an independent significant predictor of graft failure after revision ACLR with a >2-fold OR of subsequent graft rupture in revision ACL surgery. Registration: NCT00625885 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.