In recent years, there has been a growth in public concern over police decisionmaking practices during traffic enforcement. Catch phrases such as "racial profiling," "driving while Black," and "driving while brown" typify the public's concern that race and ethnicity have undue influence on police discretion. This study analyzes traffic stop data from a medium-sized midwestern community to better understand this facet of police behavior. Although the authors contend that "proving" racial profiling may be outside of current empirical capabilities, useful insights can still be obtained by examining broader aspects of traffic enforcement behaviors. The analysis indicated that race was powerful in shaping police decision-making patterns, but so were gender, age, and situational considerations. A number of implications for research and policy emerging from the analysis are discussed.Since the inception of modern policing systems, there has been concern about the role played by race and ethnicity in policing and police decisionmaking practices. One of the most pervasive issues currently is the debate
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.