No abstract

No abstract

Background: An infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is the obligatory aetiological factor for the development of cervical cancer. In Switzerland, the prevention strategy for cervical cancer is based on primary prevention via HPV vaccination and secondary prevention with an opportunistic screening programme for precancerous lesions. Vaccination is recommended to 11-26 years old male and female persons. The objective of the study was to assess the epidemiological impact on cervical cancer of switching from the currently implemented programme with the 4-valent vaccine to the 9-valent vaccine, in an 11-26 years old gender-neutral vaccination programme in Switzerland. Methods: A previously validated dynamic transmission model of HPV infections was adapted and calibrated to the Swiss setting assuming an 80% coverage rate in HPV-vaccination and lifelong vaccine type-specific protection. A gender-neutral vaccination programme (males and females) for 11-26 years old with a 9-valent HPV vaccine was compared with the current 11-26 years old gender-neutral 4-valent vaccination programme. Sensitivity analyses were conducted in order to test the impact of lower vaccination coverage rates and a shorter duration of protection on the model outcomes. Results: In Switzerland, a 9-valent gender-neutral vaccination programme would result in an additional prevention of 2979 cervical cancer cases, 13,862 CIN3 and 15,000 CIN2 cases, compared with the 4-valent gender-neutral vaccination programme over 100 years. These additional disease cases avoided would correspond to a 24, 36 and 48% cumulative incidence decrease in cervical cancer, CIN3 and CIN2 cases, respectively. It would also prevent additional 741 cervical cancer-related deaths over 100 years. A substantial additional reduction in cervical cancer and precancerous lesions burden is still observed when varying the vaccination coverage rate from 30 to 60% or reducing the duration of protection from lifelong to 20 years.

Accumulating evidence regarding the causative role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in a wide range of malignant and nonmalignant diseases highlights the importance of HPV testing. This study describes and discusses the efficacy and characteristics of 4 well-established and commercially available tests. Here, 181 cytologic specimens from cervical smears were analyzed using the HPV SIGN PQ (Diatech) and the Linear Array (Roche) method. Discrepant results were further studied with the Real Time High-Risk HPV (Abbott) method and the INNO-LiPA (Fujirebio) method. Of 181 cytologic specimens, 61 (34%) showed discrepant results. High-risk HPV was not detected in 9 cases by HPV SIGN PQ, in 16 cases by Linear Array, in 10 cases by Real Time High-Risk HPV, and in 6 cases by INNO-LiPA, respectively. Lack of DNA detection or problems in interpreting the result were seen in 9 cases with HPV SIGN PQ, 8 cases with Linear Array, 3 cases with Real Time High-Risk HPV, and 3 cases with INNO-LiPA, respectively. This study indicates that the choice of HPV detection method has a substantial influence on the HPV risk classification of tested PAP smears and clinical follow-up decisions.

Vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease of the anogenitalarea leading to itch, burning, sexual dysfunction and impaired quality of life. An unmet need in the context of LS is a practical, easily assessable grading scale to classify disease severity and to allow intra-and interindividual comparisons. The objectives of this study were i) to assess the prevalence and severity of 23 items proposed by a recent Delphi consensus group in patients with adult VLS. ii) to develop a clinical severity scale and, iii) to test the interrater reliability of this novel severity scale. A retrospective assessment of the prevalence and severity of 23 items in 143 patients was performed by using patient records and photo documentation to develop a novel clinical severity scale (i.e. the "Clinical Lichen Sclerosus Score" = CLISSCO) for VLS. Thereafter, the CLISSCO was validated by 16 raters. We found that the items proposed by the consensus group vary markedly in frequency and severity. Following selection of the most relevant items, the CLISSCO was developed consisting of 3 "Symptoms", 3 "Signs" and 6 "Architectural changes" rated on a 0-4 point Likert-scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent for each item, the applicability of the CLISSCO considered user-friendly by the raters. We conclude that the CLISSCO proved to be a user-friendly, reliable tool to assess disease severity in VLS. However, further studies are needed to validate its applicability and value in daily practice and clinical research.