Purpose: The aim of this study is to assess the agreement between manual and automated gonioscopy for iridocorneal angle opening. Methods: The research is a cross-sectional observational study. Manual and automated gonioscopy were performed to consecutive patients in a glaucoma clinic. Iridocorneal angle opening grading was performed according to Shaffer’s classification. Automated gonioscopy was performed with NGS-1 automated gonioscope (NIDEK Co., Gamagori, Japan). The automated gonio-photos were graded by two independent observers. Agreement between automated and manual gonioscopy and also among raters was ascertained by Fleiss’ kappa statistic and comparison of area under curve. Results: In total, 88 eyes of 47 subjects were analysed. Mean age was 63 ± 10 years. Twenty eyes (22.7%) were excluded from grading due to poor quality images. Angle closure was detected in 23.4% with dynamic gonioscopy in comparison with 4.3% using automated image grading. The agreement for angle closure diagnosis between dynamic and automated gonioscopy was low (κ = 0.09 ± 0.10; p = 0.18). The area under curve for detecting eyes with angle closure showed poor accuracy between automated and manual methods (area under curve: 0.53 ± 0.05, 95% confidence interval: 0.44–0.62). There was modest inter-rater agreement for angle opening assessment of automated images with Fleiss’ kappa of 0.17 (95% confidence interval: 0.035–0.238). Conclusion: Manual and automated gonioscopy showed only slight agreement for the assessment of iridocorneal angle opening status. Further improvements of the NGS-1 automated gonioscopy and technique are desired for widespread use in a real-life setting.

AimComparing outcomes after combined phacoemulsification, two iStents insertion and endocyclophotocoagulation (ECP) versus phacoemulsification-iStents alone.MethodsThis is a longitudinal retrospective 12 months study in eyes with ocular hypertension or early-to-moderate open angle glaucoma. Level of disease, intraocular pressure (IOP) and tolerance of glaucoma medication were considered before planning surgery. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA-logMAR), IOP (mm Hg), number of medications were assessed at baseline, week 1, week 5, month 3, 6, 12 postop. Main outcome: percentage (%) in IOP reduction at 12 months vs medicated baseline. Secondary outcomes: absolute values of IOP/medication reduction, BCVA and postop complications.ResultsThe ICE2 (two iStents-cataract extraction-ECP) group included 63 eyes and Phaco-iStent group included 46 eyes. Baseline IOP was higher in the ICE2 than phaco-iStent group (19.97±4.31 mm Hg vs 17.63±3.86 mm Hg, p=0.004) and mean deviation was lower (−7.20±2.58 dB vs −4.94±4.51 dB, p=0.037). Number of medications were comparable at baseline: 2.22±1.06 (ICE2) vs 2.07±1.02 (phaco-iStent), p=0.442. At month 12 postop, IOP in the ICE2 group decreased 35% from baseline vs 21% in the phaco-iStent group (p=0.03); absolute IOP reduction was significantly lower than baseline in each group (p<0.001), yet final IOP was lower in the ICE2 group than phaco-iStent group (13.05±2.18 mm Hg vs 14.09±1.86 mm Hg, p=0.01). Similar results were found for glaucoma medication (1.24±1.05 in ICE2 group vs 1.39±1.03 in phaco-iStent group, p=0.01). Final BCVA was 0.11±0.18 (phaco-iStent group) vs 0.08±0.08 (ICE2 group), p=0.309. Safety outcomes were comparable between groups.ConclusionICE2 procedure offers better results in IOP/medication reduction at 12 months than phacoemulsification-iStents alone.

Purpose: The XEN gel stent is a minimally invasive surgical device aimed at creating a subconjunctival drainage of aqueous humor, thereby reducing intraocular pressure (IOP). Being a novel device, doubts remain with regard to the efficacy and safety of its implantation in the early stage of new users. This paper illustrates the XEN implantation learning curve, assessed through several surgeons of different expertise. Methods: This was a retrospective study on the first 6 XEN implants performed by each of the 10 certified ophthalmic surgeons. Simultaneous cataract surgery was allowed (phaco-XEN). Primary outcomes were as follows: surgical time; intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications. Secondary outcomes were as follows: IOP; the number of topical drugs in use; the need for needling procedures. Outcome data were collected preoperatively and at postoperative days 1, 7, 15, 30, 60, and 90. Statistical analysis was performed with STATA 14.1 and SPSS. Results: Sixty patients were included (56.7% female patients). Mean age was 73 years (45 to 89). Mean preoperative IOP was 23.8±8.95 mm Hg. From the included patients, 29 (48.3%) were submitted to simple XEN implant and 31 (51.7%) to phaco-XEN. In both groups, mean surgical time decreased by 9 minutes throughout the 6-implant learning curve. Final IOP was 15±7.27 mm Hg in the stent group (−43% than baseline), and 14.92±3.32 mm Hg in the phaco-XEN group (−16% than baseline). On average, patients decreased 2 topical IOP-lowering drugs. Needling procedures were performed in 17 patients (28.3%). Conclusions: XEN gel stent was associated with a fast learning curve, by both experienced surgeons and novice residents. By the sixth implant, both groups had considerably decreased mean surgical time and complication rates.