The results of our study are directly applicable to initiate rational, preventive and therapeutic measures with greater accuracy in dogs with corneal ulcer.

Knowledge of epidemiological and mycological characteristics of onychomycosis has been noted by many authors as being an important tool for control of these fungal infections. This study seeks to improve knowledge of onychomycosis epidemiology and mycological features. Samples were taken from infected fingernails and toenailsOnychomycosis is a denomination used to describe nail infection usually caused by dermatophytes, yeast, and non-dermatophytic moulds (Mercantini et al. 1996, Weitzman & Summerbell 1996. These fungi may cause onychomycosis particularly as secondary invaders after damage by trauma or disease (Haneke 1991, Elewski 1998.Onychomycosis affects approximately 5% of the population worldwide (Murray & Dawber 2002) and represents around 30% of all superficial mycotic infection (Migdley et al. 1994) and 50% of nail disorders (Drake et al. 1996, Ghannoum et al. 2000.Dermatophytes are responsible for nearly 90% of toenail onychomycosis and at least 50% of fingernail infections (Elewski 1998). Candida species, particularly C. albicans, prevail in fingernail infections (Lopes et al. 1999, Pontes et al. 2002. Non-dermatophytic moulds are rare, but a number of species, such as Fusarim spp., Scytalidium spp., and Acremonium spp. have also been described as etiological agents of onychomycosis (Migdley et al. 1994, Tosti et al. 2000, Pontes et al. 2002.The epidemiology of onychomycosis has been well studied in some countries, but few data are available in tropical countries (Kam et al. 1997). In addition, research on this theme is poorly exploited in Northeast Brazil. This study, therefore, seeks to improve knowledge of the epidemiology and the mycological features of onychomycosis. Specimen collection and processing -The specimens were obtained from clinically abnormal nails, by a vigorous scraping of the nail bed, the underside of the nail plate and the hyponychyum, after cleaning the affected areas with 80% ethanol. The samples of each patient were placed in separate sterile Petri dish and transported to Medical Mycology Specialized Center. Scales scraped from the nails were analyzed for fungal elements, such as hyphae or blastoconidia, by direct microscopy examination, in potassium hydroxide (30%). For fungal cultures, all samples were inoculated on each of three isolation media (i) Sabouraud glucose agar (SGA; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI), (ii) SGA with 5% chloramphenicol, and (iii) Mycosel agar (Sanofi, France). The culture tubes were incubated at 28°C and examined daily for one month. Specimens from the lesions were repeatedly collected three times when it was observed growth of a nondermatophyte alone from a specimen that has tested positive for fungi on direct microscopy.Strain identification -The yeast isolates were identified according to morphological characteristics and the biochemical profile. To determine yeast micromorphology, cornmeal-Tween 80 agar plates were streaked and stabbed with a 48-h-old yeast colony, covered with a sterile cover-

Cockatiels are the world's second most popular psittacine pet bird, but no data characterizing their gastrointestinal microbiota have been found. Thus, the aim of this work was to characterize the yeast gastrointestinal microbiota of cockatiels and to evaluate the relevance of cockatiels as carriers of potentially pathogenic yeasts. A total of 60 cockatiels, from 15 different premises, were assessed. A thorough clinical examination was performed with each bird, and samples were collected from oral cavity, crop and cloaca. The stools were collected from cages where the birds were kept. The isolates were identified according to morphological and biochemical characteristics. Yeasts were isolated from at least one anatomical site of 65 % of the birds and 64.3 % of the stool samples. The oral cavity (53.3 %) and the crop (58.3 %) were the anatomical sites with the highest prevalence and the highest number of yeast isolates. Overall, 120 yeast isolates, belonging to 13 species, were obtained. The most frequently isolated species were Candida albicans, with 39 (32.5 %) isolates, followed by Candida tropicalis (20 %), Trichosporon asteroides (12.5 %), Candida famata (10 %) and others. Mixed yeast colonies were isolated from 23.3 % of the birds and C. albicans was seldom found in association with other species (P,0.05). The results of this work demonstrated that cockatiels harbour potentially pathogenic yeasts throughout their gastrointestinal tract and in stools, and are prone to disseminating them in the environment.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the antifungal activity of farnesol and its interaction with traditional antifungals against drug-resistant strains of Candida species. To do so, we studied the minimum in vitro inhibitory concentration (MIC) of amphotericin B (AMB), fluconazole (FLC), itraconazole (ITC), caspofungin (CAS) and farnesol against 45 isolates of Candida spp., i.e., 24 C. albicans, 16 C. parapsilosis and 5 C. tropicalis through the use of the broth microdilution method. Then, the isolates were tested with the combination of farnesol plus drugs to which they were previously found to be resistant. Additionally, the strains were pre-incubated at sub-inhibitory farnesol concentrations and their antifungal susceptibilities were re-evaluated. We found the MIC values for farnesol varied from 4.68-150 µM for Candida spp., with 19 isolates having a MIC > 1 mg/l, 18 a MIC ≥ 64 mg/l, 35 having a MIC ≥ 1 mg/l and 6 isolates a MIC ≥ 2 mg/l or were resistant to AMB, FLC, ITC and CAS, respectively. Significant MIC reductions were observed when farnesol and antifungal drugs were combined (P < 0.05) and when Candida strains were incubated with farnesol (P < 0.05). We conclude that the in vitro effects of farnesol improved the activity of traditional antifungals to which the Candida spp. isolates were resistant. These results support further investigation of the role of farnesol in the balance of the sterol biosynthetic pathway and how it interferes with cell viability.

No abstract