SummaryBackgroundSurgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common infections associated with health care, but its importance as a global health priority is not fully understood. We quantified the burden of SSI after gastrointestinal surgery in countries in all parts of the world.MethodsThis international, prospective, multicentre cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing elective or emergency gastrointestinal resection within 2-week time periods at any health-care facility in any country. Countries with participating centres were stratified into high-income, middle-income, and low-income groups according to the UN's Human Development Index (HDI). Data variables from the GlobalSurg 1 study and other studies that have been found to affect the likelihood of SSI were entered into risk adjustment models. The primary outcome measure was the 30-day SSI incidence (defined by US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for superficial and deep incisional SSI). Relationships with explanatory variables were examined using Bayesian multilevel logistic regression models. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02662231.FindingsBetween Jan 4, 2016, and July 31, 2016, 13 265 records were submitted for analysis. 12 539 patients from 343 hospitals in 66 countries were included. 7339 (58·5%) patient were from high-HDI countries (193 hospitals in 30 countries), 3918 (31·2%) patients were from middle-HDI countries (82 hospitals in 18 countries), and 1282 (10·2%) patients were from low-HDI countries (68 hospitals in 18 countries). In total, 1538 (12·3%) patients had SSI within 30 days of surgery. The incidence of SSI varied between countries with high (691 [9·4%] of 7339 patients), middle (549 [14·0%] of 3918 patients), and low (298 [23·2%] of 1282) HDI (p<0·001). The highest SSI incidence in each HDI group was after dirty surgery (102 [17·8%] of 574 patients in high-HDI countries; 74 [31·4%] of 236 patients in middle-HDI countries; 72 [39·8%] of 181 patients in low-HDI countries). Following risk factor adjustment, patients in low-HDI countries were at greatest risk of SSI (adjusted odds ratio 1·60, 95% credible interval 1·05–2·37; p=0·030). 132 (21·6%) of 610 patients with an SSI and a microbiology culture result had an infection that was resistant to the prophylactic antibiotic used. Resistant infections were detected in 49 (16·6%) of 295 patients in high-HDI countries, in 37 (19·8%) of 187 patients in middle-HDI countries, and in 46 (35·9%) of 128 patients in low-HDI countries (p<0·001).InterpretationCountries with a low HDI carry a disproportionately greater burden of SSI than countries with a middle or high HDI and might have higher rates of antibiotic resistance. In view of WHO recommendations on SSI prevention that highlight the absence of high-quality interventional research, urgent, pragmatic, randomised trials based in LMICs are needed to assess measures aiming to reduce this preventable complication.FundingDFID-MRC-Wellcome Trust Joint Global Health Trial Development Grant,...

No abstract

PPurpose: Lung cancers bearing oncogenic EML4-ALK fusions respond to targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; e.g. alectinib), with variation in the degree of shrinkage and duration of treatment (DOT). We previously demonstrated a positive association of a TKI-induced interferon gamma (IFNgamma) transcriptional response with DOT in EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Herein, we used murine models of EML4-ALK lung cancer to test a role for host immunity in the therapeutic response to alectinib. Experimental Design: Three murine EML4-ALK cell lines (EA1, EA2, EA3) were implanted orthotopically into the lungs of immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice and treated with alectinib. Tumor volumes were serially measured by micro CT. Immune cell content was measured by flow cytometry, multispectral immunofluorescence and CyTOF. Transcriptional responses to alectinib were assessed by RNAseq and secreted chemokines were measured by ELISA. Results: All cell lines were sensitive to alectinib in vitro. EA1 and EA3 tumors retained residual disease that rapidly progressed upon termination of treatment while EA2 tumors were eliminated by TKI treatment. Alectinib induced inflammatory transcriptional programs and multiple chemokines in all cell lines while untreated tumors exhibited distinct baseline chemokine expression patterns and content of CD8+ T cells and myeloid subsets. When propagated in immune-deficient mice, all three cell line-derived lung tumor models exhibited significant shrinkage followed by prompt progression despite continuous alectinib treatment. Conclusions: The findings support an hypothesis that host and TKI-stimulated production of chemokines by tumor cells promotes functional engagement of adaptive immune cells within the tumor microenvironment that enhances the durability and depth of TKI response.

Lung cancers bearing oncogenic EML4-ALK fusions respond to targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; e.g., alectinib), with variation in the degree of shrinkage and duration of treatment (DOT). However, factors that control this response are not well understood. While the contribution of the immune system in mediating the response to immunotherapy has been extensively investigated, less is known regarding the contribution of immunity to TKI therapeutic responses. We previously demonstrated a positive association of a TKI-induced interferon gamma (IFNγ) transcriptional response with DOT in EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Herein, we used three murine models of EML4-ALK lung cancer to test the role for host immunity in the alectinib therapeutic response. The cell lines (EA1, EA2, EA3) were propagated orthotopically in the lungs of immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice and treated with alectinib. Tumor volumes were serially measured by μCT and immune cell content was measured by flow cytometry and multispectral immunofluorescence. Transcriptional responses to alectinib were assessed by RNAseq and secreted chemokines were measured by ELISA. All cell lines were similarly sensitive to alectinib in vitro and as orthotopic tumors in immunocompetent mice, exhibited durable shrinkage. However, in immunodeficient mice, all tumor models rapidly progressed on TKI therapy. In immunocompetent mice, EA2 tumors exhibited a complete response, whereas EA1 and EA3 tumors retained residual disease that rapidly progressed upon termination of TKI treatment. Prior to treatment, EA2 tumors had greater numbers of CD8+ T cells and fewer neutrophils compared to EA1 tumors. Also, RNAseq of cancer cells recovered from untreated tumors revealed elevated levels of CXCL9 and 10 in EA2 tumors, and higher levels of CXCL1 and 2 in EA1 tumors. Analysis of pre-treatment patient biopsies from ALK+ tumors revealed an association of neutrophil content with shorter time to progression. Combined, these data support a role for adaptive immunity in durability of TKI responses and demonstrate that the immune cell composition of the tumor microenvironment is predictive of response to alectinib therapy.

IntroductionIn vivo, cancer cells respond to signals from the tumor microenvironment resulting in changes in expression of proteins that promote tumor progression and suppress anti-tumor immunity. This study employed an orthotopic immunocompetent model of lung cancer to define pathways that are altered in cancer cells recovered from tumors compared to cells grown in culture.MethodsStudies used four murine cell lines implanted into the lungs of syngeneic mice. Cancer cells were recovered using FACS, and transcriptional changes compared to cells grown in culture were determined by RNA-seq.ResultsChanges in interferon response, antigen presentation and cytokine signaling were observed in all tumors. In addition, we observed induction of the complement pathway. We previously demonstrated that activation of complement is critical for tumor progression in this model. Complement can play both a pro-tumorigenic role through production of anaphylatoxins, and an anti-tumorigenic role by promoting complement-mediated cell killing of cancer cells. While complement proteins are produced by the liver, expression of complement proteins by cancer cells has been described. Silencing cancer cell-specific C3 inhibited tumor growth In vivo. We hypothesized that induction of complement regulatory proteins was critical for blocking the anti-tumor effects of complement activation. Silencing complement regulatory proteins also inhibited tumor growth, with different regulatory proteins acting in a cell-specific manner.DiscussionBased on these data we propose that localized induction of complement in cancer cells is a common feature of lung tumors that promotes tumor progression, with induction of complement regulatory proteins protecting cells from complement mediated-cell killing.