During the evolutionary process, genomes are affected by various genome rearrangements, that is, events that modify large stretches of the genetic material. In the literature, a large number of models have been proposed to estimate the number of events that occurred during evolution; most of them represent a genome as an ordered sequence of genes, and, in particular, disregard the genetic material between consecutive genes. However, recent studies showed that taking into account the genetic material between consecutive genes can enhance evolutionary distance estimations. Reversal and transposition are genome rearrangements that have been widely studied in the literature. A reversal inverts a (contiguous) segment of the genome, while a transposition swaps the positions of two consecutive segments. Genomes also undergo nonconservative events (events that alter the amount of genetic material) such as insertions and deletions, in which genetic material from intergenic regions of the genome is inserted or deleted, respectively. In this article, we study a genome rearrangement model that considers both gene order and sizes of intergenic regions. We investigate the reversal distance, and also the reversal and transposition distance between two genomes in two scenarios: with and without nonconservative events. We show that these problems are NP-hard and we present constant ratio approximation algorithms for all of them. More precisely, we provide a 4-approximation algorithm for the reversal distance, both in the conservative and nonconservative versions. For the reversal and transposition distance, we provide a 4.5-approximation algorithm, both in the conservative and nonconservative versions. We also perform experimental tests to verify the behavior of our algorithms, as well as to compare the practical and theoretical results. We finally extend our study to scenarios in which events have different costs, and we present constant ratio approximation algorithms for each scenario.

No abstract

BackgroundThe evolutionary distance between two genomes can be estimated by computing a minimum length sequence of operations, called genome rearrangements, that transform one genome into another. Usually, a genome is modeled as an ordered sequence of genes, and most of the studies in the genome rearrangement literature consist in shaping biological scenarios into mathematical models. For instance, allowing different genome rearrangements operations at the same time, adding constraints to these rearrangements (e.g., each rearrangement can affect at most a given number of genes), considering that a rearrangement implies a cost depending on its length rather than a unit cost, etc. Most of the works, however, have overlooked some important features inside genomes, such as the presence of sequences of nucleotides between genes, called intergenic regions.Results and conclusionsIn this work, we investigate the problem of computing the distance between two genomes, taking into account both gene order and intergenic sizes. The genome rearrangement operations we consider here are constrained types of reversals and transpositions, called super short reversals (SSRs) and super short transpositions (SSTs), which affect up to two (consecutive) genes. We denote by super short operations (SSOs) any SSR or SST. We show 3-approximation algorithms when the orientation of the genes is not considered when we allow SSRs, SSTs, or SSOs, and 5-approximation algorithms when considering the orientation for either SSRs or SSOs. We also show that these algorithms improve their approximation factors when the input permutation has a higher number of inversions, where the approximation factor decreases from 3 to either 2 or 1.5, and from 5 to either 3 or 2.

One of the main challenges in Computational Biology is to find the evolutionary distance between two organisms. In the field of comparative genomics, one way to estimate such distance is to find a minimum cost sequence of rearrangements (large scale mutations) needed to transform one genome into another, which is called the rearrangement distance. In the past decades, these problems were studied considering many types of rearrangements (such as reversals, transpositions, transreversals, and revrevs) and considering the same weight for all rearrangements, or different weights depending on the types of rearrangements. The complexity of the problems involving reversals, transpositions, and both rearrangements is known, even though the hardness proof for the problem combining reversals and transpositions was recently given. In this paper, we enhance the knowledge for these problems by proving that models involving transpositions alongside reversals, transreversals, and revrevs are NP-hard, considering weights w1 for reversals and w2 for the other rearrangements such that w2/w1 ≤ 1.5. In addition, we address a cost function related to the number of fragmentations caused by a rearrangement, proving that the problem of finding a minimum cost sorting sequence, considering the fragmentation cost function with some restrictions, is NP-hard for transpositions and the combination of reversals and transpositions.

Problems in the genome rearrangement field are often formulated in terms of pairwise genome comparison: given two genomes [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], find the minimum number of genome rearrangements that may have occurred during the evolutionary process. This broad definition lacks at least two important considerations: the first being which features are extracted from genomes to create a useful mathematical model, and the second being which types of genome rearrangement events should be represented. Regarding the first consideration, seminal works in the genome rearrangement field solely used gene order to represent genomes as permutations of integer numbers, neglecting many important aspects like gene duplication, intergenic regions, and complex interactions between genes. Regarding the second consideration, some rearrangement events are widely studied such as reversals and transpositions. In this paper, we shed light on the first consideration and created a model that takes into account gene order and the number of nucleotides in intergenic regions. In addition, we consider events of reversals, transpositions, and indels (insertions and deletions) of genomic material. We present a 4-approximation algorithm for reversals and indels, a [Formula: see text]-approximation algorithm for transpositions and indels, and a 6-approximation for reversals, transpositions, and indels.