To assess the safety of supervised exercise (SE) in acute sport-related concussion (SRC) and its influence on recovery. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: University SRC clinic at a tertiary care center. Patients: One hundred ninety-four consecutive new patient charts were reviewed. Patients were included if they were seen within 30 days of sustaining a SRC, and their medical records included all required data elements. One hundred twenty-six patients were included in the analysis. Interventions: Symptomatic patients who initiated SE within 16 days of SRC (n 5 24) were compared with those who did not undergo SE or initiated SE after postinjury day 16 (n 5 84). Age, sex, history of previous concussions, injury severity, relevant comorbidities, and other treatments received were included in the analysis. Main Outcome Measures: The association between early SE and clearance for return to sport was determined using a hazard ratio (HR). The number of days from SRC until clearance for return to sport and the number of days symptomatic from concussion were also compared between early SE and nonearly SE cohorts. Results: No serious adverse events occurred in the early SE group. Early SE was associated with earlier return to sport (HR 5 2.35, P 5 0.030). The early SE group had fewer days from SRC until clearance for return to sport (mean 26.5 6 11.2 days vs 35.1 6 26.5 days, P 5 0.020). There was a trend toward fewer symptomatic days in the early SE group (P 5 0.054). Conclusion: Early SE performed in the symptomatic stage of SRC was safe and associated with earlier return to sport.
OBJECTIVEPrevious studies have shown that clinically asymptomatic high-acceleration head impacts (HHIs) may be associated with neuronal and axonal injury, as measured by advanced imaging and biomarkers. Unfortunately, these methods of measurement are time-consuming, invasive, and costly. A quick noninvasive measurement tool is needed to aid studies of head injury and its biological impact. Quantitative pupillometry is a potential objective, rapid, noninvasive measurement tool that may be used to assess the neurological effects of HHIs. In this study, the authors investigated the effect of HHIs on pupillary metrics, as measured using a pupillometer, in the absence of a diagnosed concussion.METHODSA prospective observational cohort study involving 18 high school football athletes was performed. These athletes were monitored for both the frequency and magnitude of head impacts that they sustained throughout a playing season by using the Head Impact Telemetry System. An HHI was defined as an impact exceeding 95g linear acceleration and 3760 rad/sec2 rotational acceleration. Pupillary assessments were performed at baseline, midseason, after occurrence of an HHI, and at the end of the season by using the NeurOptics NPi-200 pupillometer. The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, 5th Edition (SCAT5), was also used at each time point. Comparisons of data obtained at the various time points were calculated using a repeated-measures analysis of variance and a t-test.RESULTSSeven athletes sustained HHIs without a related diagnosed concussion. Following these HHIs, the athletes demonstrated decreases in pupil dilation velocity (mean difference 0.139 mm/sec; p = 0.048), percent change in pupil diameter (mean difference 3.643%; p = 0.002), and maximum constriction velocity (mean difference 0.744 mm/sec; p = 0.010), compared to measurements obtained at the athletes’ own midseason evaluations. No significant changes occurred between the SCAT5 subtest scores calculated at midseason and those after a high impact, although the effect sizes (Cohen’s d) on individual components ranged from 0.41 to 0.65.CONCLUSIONSMeasurable changes in pupil response were demonstrated following an HHI. These results suggest that clinically asymptomatic HHIs may affect brain reflex pathways, reflecting a biological injury previously seen when more invasive methods were applied.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.