No abstract

Aim: Graciloplasty (GP) is indicated in the case of recurrent rectovaginal fistula (RVF) after failure of previous local treatments. The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for GP failure performed for RVF.Methods: This is a retrospective study based on a prospective database on GP, coming from two expert centres.Results: Sixty-one patients undergoing a first GP for RVF (n = 51) or ileal-vaginal fistula after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (n = 10), with a mean age of 42 years (range 24-72), were analysed. After a mean follow-up of 56 ± 48 months (range 1-183), failure of GP (considered as persistent stoma and/or clinical RVF) was noted in 24/61 patients (39%).The failure rate was 43% (13/30) in the case of Crohn's disease, 38% (3/8) in the case of ileal-vaginal fistula after ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis, 30% (3/10) in the case of obstetrical RVF, 33% (1/3) in the case of post radiotherapy RVF and 40% (4/10) for other causes (not significant). Two risk factors for failure of GP were found on univariate analysis: (1) absence of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis-only 3/24 (13%) patients with failure of GP received postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis versus 18/37 (49%) patients with success of GP (P = 0.0053); (2) postoperative perineal infection-11/23 (48%) with failure of GP developed postoperative perineal infection versus only 4/37 (10%) patients with success of GP (P = 0.0021). Conclusions:Failure of GP for RVF is observed in approximately 40% of the patients whatever the aetiology of the fistula. A reduced failure rate was associated with systematic postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic is having a deep impact on emergency surgical services, with a significant reduction of patients admitted into emergency surgical units world widely. Reliable figures of this reduction have not been produced yet. Our international audit aimed at giving a precise snapshot of the absolute and relative changes of emergency surgical admissions at the outbreak of the pandemic. Materials and methods Datasets of patients admitted as general surgical emergencies into 45 internationally distributed emergency surgical units during the months of March and April 2020 (Covid-19 pandemic outbreak) were collected and compared with those of patients admitted into the same units during the months of March and April 2019 (pre-Covid-19). Primary endpoint was to evaluate the relative variation of the presentation symptoms and discharge diagnoses between the two study periods. Secondary endpoint was to identify the possible change of therapeutic strategy during the same two periods. Results Forty-five centres participated sent their anonymised data to the study hub, for a total of 6263 patients. Of these, 3810 were admitted in the pre-Covid period and 2453 in the Covid period, for a 35.6% absolute reduction. The most common presentation was abdominal pain, whose incidence did not change between the two periods, but in the Covid period patients presented less frequently with anal pain, hernias, anaemia and weight loss. ASA 1 and low frailty patients were admitted less frequently, while ASA>1 and frail patients showed a relative increase. The type of surgical access did not change significantly, but lap-to-open conversion rate halved between the two study periods. Discharge diagnoses of appendicitis and diverticulitis reduced significantly, while bowel ischaemia and perianal ailments had a significant relative increase. Conclusions Our audit demonstrates a significant overall reduction of emergency surgery admissions at the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic with a minimal change of the proportions of single presentations, diagnoses and treatments. These findings may open the door to new ways of managing surgical emergencies without engulfing the already busy hospitals.