Objective: To assess the scientific evidence related to the efficacy of clear aligner treatment (CAT) in controlling orthodontic tooth movement. Materials and Methods: PubMed, PMC, NLM, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, Google Scholar, and LILACs were searched from January 2000 to June 2014 to identify all peer-reviewed articles potentially relevant to the review. Methodological shortcomings were highlighted and the quality of the studies was ranked using the Cochrane Tool for Risk of Bias Assessment. Results: Eleven relevant articles were selected (two Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT), five prospective non-randomized, four retrospective non-randomized), and the risk of bias was moderate for six studies and unclear for the others. The amount of mean intrusion reported was 0.72 mm. Extrusion was the most difficult movement to control (30% of accuracy), followed by rotation. Upper molar distalization revealed the highest predictability (88%) when a bodily movement of at least 1.5 mm was prescribed. A decrease of the Little's Index (mandibular arch: 5 mm; maxillary arch: 4 mm) was observed in aligning arches. Conclusions: CAT aligns and levels the arches; it is effective in controlling anterior intrusion but not anterior extrusion; it is effective in controlling posterior buccolingual inclination but not anterior buccolingual inclination; it is effective in controlling upper molar bodily movements of about 1.5 mm; and it is not effective in controlling rotation of rounded teeth in particular. However, the results of this review should be interpreted with caution because of the number, quality, and heterogeneity of the studies. (Angle Orthod. 2015;85:881-889.)

No abstract

Recent polysomnographic (PSG) studies showed that the sleep bruxism (SB) event is preceded by a sudden shift in autonomic cardiac activity. Therefore, heart rate could be the simplest-to-record parameter for use in addition to portable home EMG monitoring to improve the accuracy in automatic detection of SB events. The aim of the study was to compare the detection of SB episodes by combined surface electromyography and heart rate (HR) recorded by a compact portable device (Bruxoff(®) ), with the scoring of SB episodes by a PSG recording. Twenty-five subjects (14 'probable' bruxers and 11 non-bruxers) were selected for the study. Each subject underwent the Bruxoff and the PSG recordings during the same night. Rhythmic masseter muscle activities (RMMAs) were scored according to published criteria. Correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman plots were calculated to measure the correlation and agreement between the two methods. Results showed a high correlation (Pearson's r = 0·95, P < 0·0001) and a high agreement (bias = 0·05) between Bruxoff and the PSG. Furthermore, the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed a high sensitivity and specificity of the portable device (92·3% and 91·6%, respectively) when the cut-off was set at 4 SB episodes per hour according to published criteria. The Bruxoff device showed a good diagnostic accuracy to differentiate RMMA from other oromotor activities. These findings are important in the light of the need for simple and reliable portable devices for the diagnosis of SB both in the clinical and research settings.

No abstract

BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that bodily maxillary molar distalization was not achievable in aligner orthodontics.MethodsForty lateral cephalograms obtained from 20 non-growing subjects (9 male, 11 female; average age 29.73 years) (group S), who underwent bilateral distalization of their maxillary dentition with Invisalign aligners (Align Technology, Inc., San José, CA, USA), were considered for the study. Skeletal class I or class II malocclusion and a bilateral end-to-end class II molar relationship were the main inclusion criteria. Cephalograms were taken at two time points: (T0) pretreatment and (T2) post-treatment. Treatment changes were evaluated between the time points using 39 variables by means of paired t test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.Reproducibility of measurements was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultsThe mean treatment time was 24.3 ± 4.2 months. At the post-treatment point, the first molar moved distally 2.25 mm without significant tipping (P = 0.27) and vertical movements (P = 0.43). The second molar distalization was 2.52 mm without significant tipping (P = 0.056) and vertical movements (P = 0.25). No significant movements were detected on the lower arch. SN^GoGn and SPP^GoGn angles showed no significant differences between pre- and post-treatment cephalograms (P = 0.22 and P = 0.85, respectively).ConclusionsAligner therapy in association with composite attachments and class II elastics can distalize maxillary first molars by 2.25 mm without significant tipping and vertical movements of the crown. No changes to the facial height were revealed.