Morbidity and mortality are reliably lower for the married compared with the unmarried across a variety of illnesses. What is less well understood is how a couple uses their relationship for recommended lifestyle changes associated with decreased risk for illness. Partners for Life compared a patient and partner approach to behavior change with a patient only approach on such factors as exercise, nutrition and medication adherence. Ninety-three patients and their spouses/partners consented to participate (26% of those eligible) and were randomized into either the individual or couples conditon. However, only 80 couples, distributed across conditions, contributed data to the analyses, due to missing data and missing data points. For exercise, there was a significant effect of couples treatment on the increase in activity and a significant effect of couples treatment on the acceleration of treatment over time. Additionally, there was an interaction between marital satisfaction and treatment condition such that patients who reported higher levels of marital distress in the individuals condition did not maintain their physical activity gains by the end of treatment, while both distressed and non-distressed patients in the couples treatment exhibited accelerating gains throughout treatment. In terms of medication adherence, patients in the couples treatment exhibited virtually no change in medication adherence over time, while patients in the individuals treatment showed a 9% relative decrease across time. There were no condition or time effects for nutritional outcomes. Finally, there was an interaction between baseline marital satisfaction and treatment condition such that patients in the individuals condition who reported lower levels of initial marital satisfaction showed deterioration in marital satisfaction, while non- satisfied patients in the couples treatment showed improvement over time.

Five sites participating in the NCI Behavior Change Consortium administered the NCI Fruit and Vegetable Screener (FVS) and multiple, nonconsecutive 24-h dietary recall interviews (24HR) to 590 participants. Three sites also obtained serum carotenoids (n = 295). Participants were primarily female, ethnically diverse, and varied by age and education. Correlations between 24HR and FVS by site ranged from 0.31 (P = 0.07) to 0.47 (P < 0.01) in men and from 0.43 to 0.63 (P < 0.01) in women. Compared with 24HR, FVS significantly (P < 0.05) overestimated intake at 2 of 4 sites for men and all 4 sites for women. Differences in estimated total servings of fruits and vegetables/d ranged from 0.16 to 3.06 servings. On average, the FVS overestimated intake by 1.76 servings in men and 2.11 servings in women. Alternative FVS scoring procedures and a 1-item screener lowered correlations with 24HR as well as serum carotenoids but alternate scoring procedures generally improved estimations of servings.

Two short frequency questionnaires, the NCI 19-item Fruit and Vegetable Screener (FVS) and a single question on overall fruit and vegetable consumption (1-item), were evaluated for their ability to assess change in fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption over time and in response to intervention among participants in 5 health promotion trials in the Behavior Change Consortium. Cross-sectional differences and correlations of FV estimates at baseline and at follow-up were compared for the FVS (n = 315) and the 1-item (n = 227), relative to multiple 24-h recall interviews (24HR). The FVS significantly overestimated daily intake by 1.27 servings at baseline among men and by 1.42 and 1.59 servings at baseline and follow-up, respectively, in women, whereas the 1-item measure significantly underestimated intake at both time points in men (0.98 serving at baseline, 0.75 serving at follow-up) and women (0.61 and 0.41 serving). Cross-sectional deattenuated correlations with 24HR at follow-up were 0.48 (FVS) and 0.50 (1-item). To evaluate the capacity of the 2 screeners to assess FV change, we compared mean posttest effects with 24HR by treatment group overall and by gender. Treatment group differences were not significant for either 24HR or 1-item. Among 315 subjects, the FVS treatment group differences were significant both overall and within gender but not when repeated in the sample of 227. Findings suggest multiple 24HR at multiple time points in adequate sample sizes remain the gold standard for FV reports. Biases in FVS estimates may reflect participants' lifestyles and sociodemographic characteristics and require further examination in longitudinal samples representative of diverse populations.

Long-term maintenance of behavioral change to reduce health risk factors is essential to producing a positive effect on medical outcomes. This study examines whether an ongoing, long-term relationship can be used to help patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease adhere to a risk-reducing behavioral intervention and maintain healthy behavioral changes. One hundred and sixty patients with diagnosed coronary artery disease will be randomized to a standard behavioral treatment group or to a standard behavioral treatment group including a couples intervention and followed for 18 months. The treatment in both groups follows tenets of cognitive behavioral and Self-Determination Theories as well as the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change. In addition, the couples intervention is designed to (1) change the patient's environment to facilitate cardiac risk-reducing behavioral changes, (2) optimize social reinforcement and motivation for behavior change, and (3) decrease relationship stress. Behavioral outcomes assessed include adherence to an exercise regimen, adherence to dietary recommendations and adherence to lipid-lowering medication. Lipid values, psychological variables and relationship variables are assessed throughout the study and at follow-up. While we expect both groups of cardiac patients to successfully adapt new health behaviors, we expect the couples intervention to be superior in helping maintain long-term health behaviors.