Abstract:Malaria is an epidemic health disease and a rapid, accurate diagnosis is necessary for proper intervention. Generally, pathologists visually examine blood stained slides for malaria diagnosis. Nevertheless, this kind of visual inspection is subjective, error-prone and time-consuming. In order to overcome the issues, numerous methods of automatic malaria diagnosis have been proposed so far. In particular, many researchers have used mathematical morphology as a powerful tool for computer aided malaria detection and classification. Mathematical morphology is not only a theory for the analysis of spatial structures, but also a very powerful technique widely used for image processing purposes and employed successfully in biomedical image analysis, especially in preprocessing and segmentation tasks. Microscopic image analysis and particularly malaria detection and classification can greatly benefit from the use of morphological operators. The aim of this paper is to present a review of recent mathematical morphology based methods for malaria parasite detection and identification in stained blood smears images.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

COVID-19, an infectious coronavirus disease, caused a pandemic with countless deaths. From the outset, clinical institutes have explored computed tomography as an effective and complementary screening tool alongside the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Deep learning techniques have shown promising results in similar medical tasks and, hence, may provide solutions to COVID-19 based on medical images of patients. We aim to contribute to the research in this field by: (i) Comparing different architectures on a public and extended reference dataset to find the most suitable; (ii) Proposing a patient-oriented investigation of the best performing networks; and (iii) Evaluating their robustness in a real-world scenario, represented by cross-dataset experiments. We exploited ten well-known convolutional neural networks on two public datasets. The results show that, on the reference dataset, the most suitable architecture is VGG19, which (i) Achieved 98.87% accuracy in the network comparison; (ii) Obtained 95.91% accuracy on the patient status classification, even though it misclassifies some patients that other networks classify correctly; and (iii) The cross-dataset experiments exhibit the limitations of deep learning approaches in a real-world scenario with 70.15% accuracy, which need further investigation to improve the robustness. Thus, VGG19 architecture showed promising performance in the classification of COVID-19 cases. Nonetheless, this architecture enables extensive improvements based on its modification, or even with preprocessing step in addition to it. Finally, the cross-dataset experiments exposed the critical weakness of classifying images from heterogeneous data sources, compatible with a real-world scenario.