Water is usually the main limiting factor for soybean productivity worldwide and yet advances in genetic improvement for drought resistance in this crop are still limited. In the present study, we investigated the physiological and molecular responses to drought in two soybean contrasting genotypes, a slow wilting N7001 and a drought sensitive TJS2049 cultivars. Measurements of stomatal conductance, carbon isotope ratios and accumulated dry matter showed that N7001 responds to drought by employing mechanisms resulting in a more efficient water use than TJS2049. To provide an insight into the molecular mechanisms that these cultivars employ to deal with water stress, their early and late transcriptional responses to drought were analyzed by suppression subtractive hybridization. A number of differentially regulated genes from N7001 were identified and their expression pattern was compared between in this genotype and TJS2049. Overall, the data set indicated that N7001 responds to drought earlier than TJ2049 by up-regulating a larger number of genes, most of them encoding proteins with regulatory and signaling functions. The data supports the idea that at least some of the phenotypic differences between slow wilting and drought sensitive plants may rely on the regulation of the level and timing of expression of specific genes. One of the genes that exhibited a marked N7001-specific drought induction profile encoded a eukaryotic translation initiation factor iso4G (GmeIFiso4G-1a). GmeIFiso4G-1a is one of four members of this protein family in soybean, all of them sharing high sequence identity with each other. In silico analysis of GmeIFiso4G-1 promoter sequences suggested a possible functional specialization between distinct family members, which can attain differences at the transcriptional level. Conditional overexpression of GmeIFiso4G-1a in Arabidopsis conferred the transgenic plants increased tolerance to osmotic, salt, drought and low temperature stress, providing a strong experimental evidence for a direct association between a protein of this class and general abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms. Moreover, the results of this work reinforce the importance of the control of protein synthesis as a central mechanism of stress adaptation and opens up for new strategies for improving crop performance under stress.

No abstract

This practical class activity was designed to introduce students to recombinant protein expression and purification. The principal goal is to shed light on basic aspects concerning recombinant protein production, in particular protein expression, chromatography methods for protein purification, and enzyme activity as a tool to evaluate purity and conformation of the recombinant product. Herein, we describe the purification of a glutathione transferase from the human parasite Echinococcus granulosus (EgGST1), the causative agent of hydatidosis. EgGST1 is expressed fused to a histidine tag and is purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography. Protein quantification based on direct (UV absorbance) and indirect (colorimetric) methods are used and discussed. A simple colorimetric assay is used to measure GST activity and special emphasis is put on how to use these measurements to follow protein purification yields, its enrichment and its correct folding along the purification process. EgGST1 is easily expressed with high yields, purified in absence of protease inhibitors and proved to be robust concerning enzyme activity and protein integrity on a 1 week practical activity.

Genome editing using the CRISPR/Cas9 system is one of the trendiest methodologies in the scientific community. Many genome editing approaches require recombinant Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) at some point during their application, for instance, for in vitro validation of single guide RNAs (SgRNAs) or for the DNA-free editing of genes of interest. Hereby, we provide a simple and detailed expression and purification protocol for SpCas9 as a protein fused to GFP and MBP. This protocol improves protein yield and simplifies the purification process by overcoming the frequently occurring obstacles such as plasmid loss, inconsistent protein expression levels, or inadequate protein binding to affinity resins. On average, this protocol yields 10 to 30 mg of purified, active, His6−MBP−SpCas9 NLS−GFP protein. The purity addressed through SDS-PAGE is > 80%.

Soybean is a globally important legume crop which is highly sensitive to drought. The identification of genes of particular relevance for drought responses provides an important basis to improve tolerance to environmental stress. Chloroplast Vesiculation (CV) genes have been characterized in Arabidopsis and rice as proteins participating in a specific chloroplast-degradation vesicular pathway (CVV) during natural or stress-induced leaf senescence. Soybean genome contains two paralogous genes encoding highly similar CV proteins, CV1 and CV2. In this study, we found that expression of CV1 was differentially upregulated by drought stress in soybean contrasting genotypes exhibiting slow-wilting (tolerant) or fast-wilting (sensitive) phenotypes. CV1 reached higher induction levels in fast-wilting plants, suggesting a negative correlation between CV1 gene expression and drought tolerance. In contrast, autophagy (ATG8) and ATI-PS (ATI1) genes were induced to higher levels in slow-wilting plants, supporting a pro-survival role for these genes in soybean drought tolerance responses. The biological function of soybean CVs in chloroplast degradation was confirmed by analyzing the effect of conditional overexpression of CV2-FLAG fusions on the accumulation of specific chloroplast proteins. Functional specificity of CV1 and CV2 genes was assessed by analyzing their specific promoter activities in transgenic Arabidopsis expressing GUS reporter gene driven by CV1 or CV2 promoters. CV1 promoter responded primarily to abiotic stimuli (hyperosmolarity, salinity and oxidative stress), while the promoter of CV2 was predominantly active during natural senescence. Both promoters were highly responsive to auxin but only CV1 responded to other stress-related hormones, such as ABA, salicylic acid and methyl jasmonate. Moreover, the dark-induced expression of CV2, but not of CV1, was strongly inhibited by cytokinin, indicating similarities in the regulation of CV2 to the reported expression of Arabidopsis and rice CV genes. Finally, we report the expression of both CV1 and CV2 genes in roots of soybean and transgenic Arabidopsis, suggesting a role for the encoded proteins in root plastids. Together, the results indicate differential roles for CV1 and CV2 in development and in responses to environmental stress, and point to CV1 as a potential target for gene editing to improve crop performance under stress without compromising natural development.