SummaryInter-and intra-fraction motion during radiation therapy for breast cancer has been a widely researched topic. Recently, however, with the emergence of new technologies and techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), field in field, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), tomotherapy and partial breast irradiation (PBI), the magnitude of this movement has become more important. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive summary of the literature relating to the magnitude of motion during radiation therapy for a breast cancer patient. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using Medline, Cinhal, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. Studies included were limited to women having radical radiation therapy to the whole breast in the supine position. Studies needed to report quantitatively on the magnitude of inter-and intra-fraction motion using electronic portal imaging, port films or kilovoltage imaging techniques. Eighteen articles fitted the selection criteria. The averages of random and systematic error for inter-and intra-fraction movement were reported using central lung distance, central irradiated width, central beam edge to skin distance and cranio-caudal distance measurements, or isocentric matching techniques. Inter-fraction motion was consistently larger than intra-fraction motion but, on average, within a 5 mm tolerance. There were, though, large maximum inter-and intra-fraction variations observed in the measurements of individual patients, which indicate the need for daily inter-and intra-fraction motion management before implementing IMRT, VMAT, tomotherapy or PBI techniques.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.