Tamoxifen resistance has been largely attributed to genetic alterations in the epithelial tumor cells themselves, such as overexpression of HER-2/Neu. However, in the clinic, only about 15–20% of cases of HER-2/ Neu amplification has actually been correlated to the acquisition of endocrine resistance, suggesting that other mechanisms must be involved as well. Using the epithelial LM05-E and the fibroblastic LM05-F cell lines, derived from the estrogen dependent spontaneous M05 mouse mammary tumor, as well as MCF-7 cells, we analyzed whether soluble stromal factors or extracellular matrix components protected against tamoxifen induced cell death. Involvement of signaling pathways was determined by using specific inhibitors and western blot, and phosphorylation of the estrogen receptor alpha by western blot and immunofluorescence. Soluble factors produced by the fibroblastic cells protect the epithelial tumor cells from tamoxifen-induced cell death through a mechanism that involves EGFR and matrix metalloproteinases upstream of PI3K/AKT. Exogenous fibronectin by itself confers endocrine resistance through interaction with β1 integrin and activation of PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK 1/2 pathways. The conferred resistance is reversed by blocking β1 integrin. We show also that treatment with both conditioned medium and fibronectin leads to the phosphorylation of the estrogen receptor at serine-118, suggesting stromal factors as modulators of ER activity. Our results show that the tumor microenvironment can modulate tamoxifen resistance, providing an alternative explanation for why patients become refractory to hormone-therapy.
Our results show that the luminal epithelial (LEP) and myoephitelial (MEP) mammary LM38-P subpopulations respond differently to ATRA, i.e., the LEP subpopulation responds with increased cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and the MEP subpopulation responds with increased senescence and adhesion, thereby decreasing its invasive capacity. Finally, we identified a third subpopulation with stem/progenitor cell characteristics within the LM38-LP mammary adenocarcinoma cell line, which appears to be non-responsive to ATRA.
It has been established that retinoids exert some of their effects on cell differentiation and malignant phenotype reversion through the interaction with different members of the protein kinase C (PKC) family. Till nowadays the nature and extension of this interaction is not well understood. Due to the cytostatic and differentiating effects of retinoids, in the present study we propose to evaluate whether the crosstalk between the retinoid system and the PKC pathway could become a possible target for breast cancer treatment. We could determine that ATRA (all-trans retinoic) treatment showed a significant growth inhibition due to (G1 or G2) cell cycle arrest both in LM3 and SKBR3, a murine and human mammary cell line respectively. ATRA also induced a remarkable increase in PKCα and PKCδ expression and activity. Interestingly, the pharmacological inhibition of these two PKC isoforms prevented the activation of retinoic acid receptors (RARs) by ATRA, indicating that both PKC isoforms are required for RARs activation. Moreover, PKCδ inhibition also impaired ATRA-induced RARα translocation to the nucleus. In vivo assays revealed that a combined treatment using ATRA and PKCα inhibitors prevented lung metastatic dissemination in an additive way. Our results clearly indicate that ATRA modulates the expression and activity of different PKCs. Besides inducing cell arrest, the activity of both PKC is necessary for the induction of the retinoic acid system. The combined ATRA and PKCα inhibitors could be an option for the hormone-independent breast cancer treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.