No abstract

Despite the possible benefits of pediatric vaccination against coronavirus disease (COVID-19), getting children and adolescents vaccinated may prove challenging as pediatric vaccination was already a hot topic prepandemic. This study aimed to understand parents and caregivers' willingness to vaccinate their children against COVID-19. A total of 406 parents and caregivers living in the province of New Brunswick, Canada, completed an online survey in March and April 2021. Results indicated that the majority of parents were willing to get their children vaccinated against COVID-19, but a quarter of parents were not considering getting their children vaccinated, were unlikely to do so or remained unsure. Results of a multinomial logistic regression revealed that parents were more willing to vaccinate their children when they showed low levels of vaccine hesitancy, considered they had satisfactory access to relevant information regarding the vaccination of their children, had higher household incomes, and had greater levels of parental agreement on vaccination. Parents were also more willing to get their children vaccinated when they believed that a higher percentage of children would eventually get the COVID-19 vaccine. Implications for education campaigns aiming at improving COVID-19 vaccination of children and adolescents are further discussed. Public Significance StatementVaccinating children and adolescents against coronavirus disease (COVID-19) will likely be an important step in overcoming the current pandemic. This study aimed to identify factors related to parents' willingness to vaccinate their children against COVID-19 in New Brunswick, Canada, in the hope that such knowledge may help education campaigns address parents' concerns and health care workers adapt their intervention.

This study examined the associations between ambivalent sexism (i.e., hostile and benevolent sexism) and relationship adjustment in young adult couples by testing an actor-partner interdependence model. The sample was composed of 219 cohabiting heterosexual Canadian couples. The findings suggest that ambivalent sexism plays a role in young adults’ perceptions of the quality of their romantic relationship, but gender differences exist. Women and men who more strongly endorsed hostile sexism tended to report lower relationship adjustment. Women’s hostile sexism was also negatively related to their partners’ relationship adjustment, whereas their benevolent sexism was positively related to their own and their partners’ relationship adjustment. For their part, men’s ambivalent sexism was unrelated to their partners’ relationship adjustment and their benevolent sexism was also unrelated to their own relationship adjustment. The results are discussed in light of the insidious consequences that can accompany ambivalent sexism. Even though hostile sexism functions to protect men’s societal advantages, it comes with costs to their romantic relationships. In contrast, despite the rewards benevolent sexism can bring on the relational level, its endorsement may hinder the attainment of gender equality by encouraging women to invest in their relationship at the expense of independent achievements.

Young adults increasingly express a desire to create egalitarian romantic partnerships, yet numerous studies have shown that women generally continue to assume the lion’s share of housework. Building on previous work on threshold levels of tolerance for dirt and disorder, on housework allocation, and on perceived fairness, the current longitudinal study documented the pathway by which threshold levels for housework lead to feelings of frustration with the partner over a period of six months. Data from 176 cohabiting emerging adult couples were analyzed using path analysis. Results confirmed the proposed model of feelings of frustration with the partner. More precisely, romantic partners’ threshold levels were associated with their and their partners’ feelings of frustration through the division of housework and perceptions of fairness. Gender differences, empirical and practical implications, and future research directions are further discussed.

Vaccine refusal by even a small subset of the population can undermine the success of the vaccination campaigns which are currently underway worldwide. The goal of this study was to identify determinants of intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine. More precisely, it aimed at examining whether socioeconomic factors, levels of mistrust toward authorities, perceived scientific consensus, and perceived severity of COVID-19 can predict vaccination intentions against COVID-19. Vaccination intentions included being ready to get vaccinated, contemplating vaccination, and not considering vaccination. A sample of 399 individuals from New Brunswick, Canada, completed an online survey in March and April 2021. Results revealed that participants who declared they would probably get vaccinated were more likely to report lower levels of mistrust toward authorities, as well as higher perceived scientific consensus and perceived severity of COVID-19, compared to those who did not intend to get vaccinated or remained unsure. Strategies to guide healthcare professionals in assisting their patients in making the best healthcare decision for their family and themselves are discussed.