No abstract

Background: Digital radiographs of the whole spine are made using marginally superimposed imaging plates exposed simultaneously to be combined by interpolation of the overlapping area. Post-processing artefacts in these radiographs leading to the misdiagnosis of implant breakage have not yet been described in the literature. Methods: An erroneous fusion of a digital spine x-ray after scoliosis surgery created an image showing two broken rods, whereas both rods proved complete continuity intraoperatively. Following an interdisciplinary error analysis, the chain of errors was systematically reconstructed. Using the digital imaging material of patients operatively treated the same way; the reproducibility of the error was analyzed. Erroneous image fusions were produced by slight displacement of existing, not yet combined x-ray images of these patients. Results: Under certain requirements, the false impression of implant breakage could be reproduced. Especially in the case of missing or malpositioned radiopaque markers, the hazard to overlook an erroneous image fusion is present. Within the post-processing step performed by qualified staff, control is indispensable and manual correction can be crucial. Conclusions: This experimental study and causal analysis show the clinical relevance of post-processing artefacts in digital radiography. To prevent false diagnosis and maltreatment, the knowledge of possible sources of error is indispensable.

Purpose Percutaneous spine procedures may occasionally be difficult and subject to complications. Navigation using a dynamic reference base (DRB) may ease the procedure. Yet, besides other shortcomings, its fixation demands additional incisions and thereby defies the percutaneous character of the procedure. Methods A new concept of atraumatic referencing was invented including a special epiDRB. The accuracy of navigated needle placement in soft tissue and bone was experimentally scrutinised. Axial and pin-point deviations from the planned trajectory were investigated with a CT-based 3D computer system. Clinical evaluation in a series of ten patients was also done. ResultsThe new epiDRB proved convenient and reliable. Its fixation to the skin with adhesive foil provided a stable reference for navigation that improves the workflow of percutaneous interventions, reduces radiation exposure and helps avoid complications. Conclusions Percutaneous spine interventions can be safely and accurately navigated using epiDRB with minimal trauma or radiation exposure and without additional skin incisions.

Background The notion that all acute hip fractures are a surgical entity requiring either surgical fracture fixation or hip replacement represents a historic dogma, particularly within the orthopaedic community of the United States. The present study from a European regional trauma center was designed to challenge the notion that stable and undisplaced femoral neck fractures represent an absolute indication for surgical management. Methods The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that stable and undisplaced femoral neck fractures of the Garden types 1 and 2 can be safely managed nonoperatively. A retrospective observational cohort study was carried out at a regional orthopaedic trauma center in Germany from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2021. The inclusion criteria specified patients older than 18 years suffering a < 24 h, traumatic, femoral neck fracture Garden types 1 and 2. Exclusion criteria included Garden types 3 and 4 femoral neck fractures, pregnancy, active infection or previous surgery, tumor-associated fractures, medical history of femoral neck necrosis, vascular injury associated with femoral neck fractures, nerve injury associated to a femoral neck fracture and ≥ 24 h femoral neck fracture. The primary intention of this research was to identify deterioration of fracture retention with an ensuing unplanned trip to the operating room in femoral neck fractures Garden types 1 and 2. Secondary were included unplanned readmissions and complications such as surgical site infection. Results A total of 41 undisplaced femoral neck fractures (Garden types 1 and 2) were included in this study; n = 20 were in the resulting admission operatively treated (group 1) and n = 21 were treated conservatively. The mean age in group 1 was 76 years; women (70%). In group 2 it was 81 years with a female dominance (71.4%). Admission status: Garden types 1 and 2, group 1 n = 13/7 and group 2 n = 15/6. Subsequent femoral neck fracture displacement (Y/N) (in case of operation, before operation) group 1 n = 14/6 and group 2 n = 6/15. Conclusion According with our results, patients sustaining Garden type 1 femoral neck fractures, depending on age and comorbidities, should be treated conservatively with weight bearing and under physiotherapeutic instructions. In case of femoral neck fractures Garden type 2, a surgical treatment should be performed in order to avoid femoral neck fractures to slip after weight bearing by lacking of fracture impaction.

A clinically evident radiculopathy without correlation in the imaging studies represents a serious problem regarding the indication, planning and execution of an operative procedure for its treatment. Both the diagnosis and treatment of such cases are deemed to be difficult without clear morphological correlation. Moreover, the surgeon lacks an important basis for the adequate planning and above all the justification of surgical treatment. Although discography with post-discographic computer tomography (CT discography) is still controversially discussed as an invasive diagnostic measure, the literature shows that this method is not only useful but also indispensable in certain cases. Based on these findings and our own empirical data, we recommend CT discography to be considered for imaging in patients suffering from lumbar radiculopathy with equivocal or insufficient MRI findings. The technique allows an accurate diagnosis and precise planning of a targeted surgical intervention such as endoscopic sequestrotomy or decompression.