The relative contribution of brake emissions to traffic-induced ambient Particulate Matter (PM) concentrations has increased over the last decade. Nowadays, vehicles’ brakes are recognised as an important source of non-exhaust emissions. Up to now, no standardised method for measuring brake particle emissions exists. For that reason, the Particle Measurement Programme (PMP) group has been working on the development of a commonly accepted method for sampling and measuring brake particle emissions. The applied braking cycle is an integral part of the overall methodology. In this article, we present the results of an interlaboratory study exploring the capacity of existing dynamometer setups to accurately execute the novel Worldwide Harmonised Light-Duty Vehicles Test Procedure (WLTP)–brake cycle. The measurements took place at eight locations in Europe and the United States. Having several dynamometers available enabled the coordination and execution of the intended exercise, to determine the sources of variability and provide recommendations for the correct application of the WLTP–brake cycle on the dyno. A systematic testing schedule was applied, followed by a thorough statistical analysis of the essential parameters according to the ISO 5725 standards series. The application of different control programmes influenced the correct replication of the cycle. Speed control turned out to be more accurate and precise than deceleration control. A crucial output of this interlaboratory study was the quantification of standard deviations for repeatability (between repeats), sample effect (between tests), laboratory effect (between facilities), and total reproducibility. Three critical aspects of the statistical analysis were: (i) The use of methods for heterogeneous materials; (ii) robust algorithms to reduce the artificial increase in variability from values with significant deviation from the normal distribution; and (iii) the reliance on the graphical representation of results for ease of understanding. Even if the study of brake emissions remained out of the scope of the current exercise, useful conclusions are drawn from the analysis of the temperature profile of the WLTP–brake cycle. Urban braking events are generally correlated to lower disc temperature. Other parameters affecting the brake temperature profile include the correct application of soak times, the temperature measurement method, the proper conditioning of incoming cooling air and the adjustment of the cooling airspeed.

No abstract

No abstract

To contribute to the understanding of the test cycle influence on brake emissions, the present study investigates the differences between the novel WLTP-based brake emission test cycle and several commonly used real-world test cycles in terms of characteristic parameters like kinetic energy and disc temperature. Building on this comparison, the effects of those differences on brake emissions are shown based on a direct comparison of three cycles on a brake emission dynamometer. The dynamometer setup includes a climate-controlled environment as well as a brake emission enclosure with a filtered incoming airflow. Using particle sampling and downstream PM measurement it is shown that the used test cycle has a significant impact on brake emissions. This fact makes clear the necessity of using realistic and representative test procedures when aiming at the evaluation of PM10 brake emissions in a reproducible and conclusive manner. The novel WLTP-based brake emission test cycle provides such a procedure and is widely accepted as standard procedure to measure brake emissions.

No abstract