No abstract

LCIG treatment administered through PEG/J-tubes gives a significant increase in quality of life for selected patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. Although minor complications are common, serious complications are infrequent, and the tube insertion procedures have a good safety record. Further development of delivery systems and evaluation of approaches designed to reduce the demand for redo endoscopy are required.

Background: Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps (CRPs) remains challenging. Imaging enhancement techniques such as narrow band imaging and blue light imaging (BLI) can improve optical diagnosis. We developed and prospectively validated a computer-aided diagnosis system (CADx) using high definition white light (HDWL) and BLI images, and compared it with the optical diagnosis of expert and novice endoscopists. Methods: The CADx characterized CRPs by exploiting artificial neural networks. Six experts and thirteen novices optically diagnosed 60 CRPs based on intuition. After a washout period of four weeks, the same set of CRPs was permuted and optically diagnosed using BASIC (BLI Adenoma Serrated International Classification). Results: The CADx had a diagnostic accuracy of 88.3% using HDWL images and 86.7% using BLI images. The overall diagnostic accuracy, combining HDWL and BLI (multimodal imaging), was 95.0% and significantly higher compared to experts (81.7%, p=0.031) and novices (66.5%, p<0.001). Sensitivity (95.6% vs. 61.1% and 55.4%) was also higher for CADx, while specificity was higher for experts compared to CADx and novices (94.1% vs 93.3% and 92.1%). For endoscopists, diagnostic accuracy did not increase using BASIC, neither for experts (Intuition 79.5% vs BASIC 81.7%, p=0.140) nor for novices (Intuition 66.7% vs BASIC 66.5%, p=0.953). Conclusion: The CADx had a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than experts and novices for the optical diagnosis of CRPs. Multimodal imaging, incorporating both HDWL and BLI, improved the diagnostic accuracy of the CADx. BASIC did not increase the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopists compared to intuitive optical diagnosis.

No abstract

BackgroundIntestinal transplantation is a procedure which inflicts immunological and infectious complications that affect the transplanted graft, posing both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) offers easy access to the entire small intestine and presents itself as an interesting option. However, at present, no studies evaluating the usefulness of video capsule endoscopies in this setting have been published. Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of VCE in detecting complications that arise after intestinal transplantation.MethodsWe included 7 adult patients with either isolated intestine (n = 1) or multivisceral grafts (n = 6). These patients underwent 12 VCE between 2004 and 2015 at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital. The median age was 42 (21-67) years (4 women/3 men). VCE was used in clinical situations where the conventional diagnostic methods failed to provide answers to the clinical question.ResultsIndications for the procedure were: suspicion of rejection (n = 4 examinations), gastrointestinal dysmotility (n = 4 examinations), high stomal output (n = 2 examinations), suspicion of lymphoproliferative disease in the transplanted graft (n = 1 examination), and clinical surveillance (n = 1 examination). The median time after transplantation for performing an examination was 740 (26-3059) days. VCE was useful in 83% of the examinations and the results influenced the planned management. The overall agreement between VCE findings and biopsies was moderate (κ = 0.54, P = 0.05) but increased when comparing the presence of inflammation/rejection (κ = 0.79, P < 0.001).ConclusionsVCE is a promising diagnostic method after intestinal transplantation. However, larger studies are needed to evaluate its potential risks and gains.