Purpose Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is responsible for most of the complications in patients with cirrhosis. Liver stiffness (LS) measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is currently used to evaluate CSPH. Bi-dimensional shear wave elastography from General Electric (2D-SWE.GE) has not yet been validated for the diagnosis of PHT. Our aims were to test whether 2D-SWE.GE-LS is able to evaluate CSPH, to determine the reliability criteria of the method and to compare its accuracy with that of VCTE-LS in this clinical setting. Materials and Methods Patients with chronic liver disease referred to hepatic catheterization (HVPG) were consecutively enrolled. HVPG and LS by both VCTE and 2D-SWE.GE were performed on the same day. The diagnostic performance of each LS method was compared against HVPG and between each other. Results 2D-SWE.GE-LS was possible in 123/127 (96.90 %) patients. The ability to record at least 5 LS measurements by 2D-SWE.GE and IQR < 30 % were the only features associated with reliable results. 2D-SWE.GE-LS was highly correlated with HVPG (r = 0.704; p < 0.0001), especially if HVPG < 10 mmHg and was significantly higher in patients with CSPH (15.52 vs. 8.14 kPa; p < 0.0001). For a cut-off value of 11.3 kPa, the AUROC of 2D-SWE.GE-LS to detect CSPH was 0.91, which was not inferior to VCTE-LS (0.92; p = 0.79). The diagnostic accuracy of LS by 2D-SWE.GE-LS to detect CSPH was similar with the one of VCTE-LS (83.74 % vs. 85.37 %; p = 0.238). The diagnostic accuracy was not enhanced by using different cut-off values which enhanced the sensitivity or the specificity. However, in the subgroup of compensated patients with alcoholic liver disease, 2D-SWE.GE-LS classified CSPH better than VCTE-LS (93.33 % vs. 85.71 %, p = 0.039). Conclusion 2D-SWE.GE-LS has good accuracy, not inferior to VCTE-LS, for the diagnosis of CSPH.

Graphical abstract Highlights• SS/LS ratio is significantly higher in patients with portal HCV compared to lobular ALD.Background & Aims: Both liver stiffness (LS) and spleen stiffness (SS) are widely used to non-invasively assess liver fibrosis and portal hypertension, respectively. We aimed to identify the impact of disease etiology, namely the localization of inflammation (portal vs. lobular), on the SS/LS ratio.Methods: In this multicenter study, LS and SS were prospectively assessed in 411 patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) using FibroScan® (Echosens, Paris); changes in these parameters were also studied in response to treatment (alcohol withdrawal, HCV therapy). LS and spleen length (SL) were further analyzed in a retrospective cohort of 449 patients with long-term data on decompensation/death. Results:Both, SS and SL were significantly higher in HCV compared to ALD (42.0 vs. 32.6 kPa, p < 0.0001, 15.6 vs. 11.9 cm, p < 0.0001) despite a lower mean LS in HCV. Consequently, the SS to LS ratio and the SL to LS ratio were significantly higher in HCV (3.8 vs. 1.72 and 1.46 vs. 0.86, p<0.0001) through all fibrosis stages. Notably, SL linearly increased with SS and the relation between SS and SL was identical in HCV and ALD. In contrast, livers were much larger in ALD at comparable LS. After treatment, LS significantly decreased in both diseases without significant changes to the SS/LS ratio. In the prognostic cohort, patients with ALD had higher LS values (30.5 vs. 21.3 kPa) and predominantly presented with jaundice (65.2%); liver failure was the major cause of death (p < 0.01). In contrast, in HCV, spleens were larger (17.6 vs. 12.1 cm) while variceal bleeding was the major cause of decompensation (73.2%) and death (p< 0.001).Conclusion: Both SS/LS and SL/LS ratios are significantly higher in patients with portal HCV compared to lobular ALD. Thus, combined LS and SS or SL measurements provide additional information about disease etiology and disease-specific complications. Crown

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract