This review evaluates the potential of optogenetic methods for the stimulation of the auditory nerve and assesses the feasability of optogenetic cochlear implants (CIs). It provides an overview of all critical steps like opsin targeting strategies, how opsins work, how their function can be modeled and included in neuronal models and the properties of light sources available for optical stimulation. From these foundations, quantitative estimates for the number of independent stimulation channels and the temporal precision of optogenetic stimulation of the auditory nerve are derived and compared with state-of-the-art electrical CIs. We conclude that optogenetic CIs have the potential to increase the number of independent stimulation channels by up to one order of magnitude to about 100, but only if light sources are able to deliver confined illumination patterns independently and parallelly. Already now, opsin variants like ChETA and Chronos enable driving of the auditory nerve up to rates of 200 spikes/s, close to the physiological value of their maximum sustained firing rate. Apart from requiring 10 times more energy than electrical stimulation, optical CIs still face major hurdles concerning the safety of gene transfection and optrode array implantation, for example, before becoming an option to replace electrical CIs.

Propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomography has become a valuable tool for visualization of three-dimensional biological samples, due to its high contrast between materials with similar attenuation properties. However, one of the most-widely used phaseretrieval algorithms imposes a homogeneity assumption onto the sample, which leads to artifacts for numerous applications where this assumption is violated. Prominent examples are biological samples with highly-absorbing implants. Using synchrotron radiation, we demonstrate by the example of a guinea pig inner ear with a cochlear implant electrode, how a recently developed model-based iterative algorithm for propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomography yields distinct benefits for such a task. We find that the model-based approach improves the overall image quality, removes the detrimental influence of the implant and accurately visualizes the cochlea.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract