BackgroundCachexia and muscle atrophy are common consequences of cancer and chemotherapy administration. The novel hormone ghrelin has been proposed as a treatment for this condition. Increases in food intake and direct effects on muscle proteolysis and protein synthesis are likely to mediate these effects, but the pathways leading to these events are not well understood.MethodsWe characterized molecular pathways involved in muscle atrophy induced by Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) tumour implantation in c57/bl6 adult male mice and by administration of the chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin in mice and in C2C12 myotubes. The effects of exogenous ghrelin administration and its mechanisms of action were examined in these settings.ResultsTumour implantation and cisplatin induced muscle atrophy by activating pro-inflammatory cytokines, p38-C/EBP-β, and myostatin, and by down-regulating Akt, myoD, and myogenin, leading to activation of ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated proteolysis and muscle weakness. Tumour implantation also increased mortality. In vitro, cisplatin up-regulated myostatin and atrogin-1 by activating C/EBP-β and FoxO1/3. Ghrelin prevented these changes in vivo and in vitro, significantly increasing muscle mass (P < 0.05 for LLC and P < 0.01 for cisplatin models) and grip strength (P = 0.038 for LLC and P = 0.001 for cisplatin models) and improving survival (P = 0.021 for LLC model).ConclusionGhrelin prevents muscle atrophy by down-regulating inflammation, p38/C/EBP-β/myostatin, and activating Akt, myogenin, and myoD. These changes appear, at least in part, to target muscle cells directly. Ghrelin administration in this setting is associated with improved muscle strength and survival.

No abstract

To determine sex differences in osmoregulation of arginine vasopressin (AVP) and body water, we studied eight men (24 +/- 1 yr) and eight women (29 +/- 2 yr) during 3% NaCl infusion [hypertonic saline infusion (HSI); 120 min, 0.1 ml. kg body wt(-1). min(-1)]. Subjects then drank 15 ml/kg body wt over 30 min followed by 60 min of rest. Women were studied in the early follicular (F; 16.1 +/- 2.8 pg/ml plasma 17beta-estradiol and 0.6 +/- 0.1 ng/ml plasma progesterone) and midluteal (L; 80.6 +/- 11.4 pg/ml plasma 17beta-estradiol and 12.7 +/- 0.7 ng/ml plasma progesterone) menstrual phases. Basal plasma osmolality was higher in F (286 +/- 1 mosmol/kgH(2)O) and in men (289 +/- 1 mosmol/kgH(2)O) compared with L (280 +/- 1 mosmol/kgH(2)O, P < 0.05). Neither menstrual phase nor gender affected basal plasma AVP concentration (P([AVP]); 1.7 +/- 4, 1.9 +/- 0.4, and 2.2 +/- 0.5 pg/ml for F, L, and men, respectively). The plasma osmolality threshold for AVP release was lowest in L (x-intercept, 263 +/- 3 mosmol/kgH(2)O, P < 0.05) compared with F (273 +/- 2 mosmol/kgH(2)O) and men (270 +/- 4 mosmol/kgH(2)O) during HSI. Men had greater P([AVP])-plasma osmolality slopes (i.e., sensitivity) compared with F and L (slopes = 0.14 +/- 0.04, 0.09 +/- 0.01, and 0.24 +/- 0.07 for F, L, and men, respectively, P < 0.05). Despite similar Na+-regulating hormone responses, men excreted less Na+ during HSI (0.7 +/- 0.1, 0.7 +/- 0.1, and 0.5 +/- 0.1 meq/kg body wt for F, L, and men, respectively, P < 0.05). Furthermore, men had greater systolic blood pressure (119 +/- 5, 119 +/- 5, and 132 +/- 3 mmHg for F, L, and men, respectively, P < 0.05) than F and L. Our data indicate greater sensitivity in P([AVP]) response to changes in plasma osmolality as the primary difference between men and women during HSI. In men, this greater sensitivity was associated with an increase in systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure during HSI, most likely due to a shift in the pressure-natriuresis curve.