Despite decades of research, studies investigating the physiological alterations caused by an acute bout of inflammation induced by exposing the lung to lipopolysaccharide have yielded inconsistent results. This can be attributed to small effects and/or a lack of fitted physiological testing. Herein, a comprehensive investigation of lung mechanics was conducted in 270 male C57BL/6 mice at 24, 48 or 96 h after an intranasal exposure to saline or lipopolysaccharide at either 1 or 3 mg/kg (30 mice per group). Traditional techniques that probe the lung using small-amplitude perturbations (i.e., oscillometry) were used, together with less conventional and new techniques that probe the lung using maneuvers of large amplitudes. The latter include a partial and a full-range pressure-volume maneuvers to measure quasi-static elastance, compliance, total lung volume, vital capacity and residual volume. The results demonstrate that lung mechanics assessed by oscillometry was only slightly affected by lipopolysaccharide, confirming previous findings. In contradistinction, lipopolysaccharide markedly altered mechanics when the lung was probed with maneuvers of large amplitudes. With the dose of 3 mg/kg at the peak of inflammation (48 h post-exposure), lipopolysaccharide increased quasi-static elastance by 26.7% (p<0.0001), and decreased compliance by 34.5% (p<0.0001). It also decreased lung volumes, including total lung capacity, vital capacity and residual volume by 33.3%, 30.5% and 43.3%, respectively (all p<0.0001). These newly reported physiological alterations represent sensitive outcomes to efficiently evaluate countermeasures (e.g., drugs) in the context of several lung diseases.
It has long been thought that erythropoietin (Epo) is exclusively involved in erythropoiesis; now, it is known that EPO in mammal's brain plays key roles in the development, maintenance, protection, and repair of the nervous system. Also, EPO in mammals contributes to the efficient use of oxygen through the regulation of mitochondrial bioenergetic. Remarkably, a similar neuroprotective impact of recombinant human EPO (rhEPO) has been found in the brain of grasshoppers, raising questions about the evolutive origin of the EPO and its generic molecular function. The objective of this study is to show that the neuroprotective effect of rhEPO in insects involves the regulation of mitochondrial functions. The experiments were performed in crickets (Acheta domesticus). These insects were exposed under normoxia and hypoxia (5 days; 6% O2) conditions. Before experimentation, the animals were treated with EPO (30 IU/ml ‐ intra‐lymphatic injection) or PBS, as a control. The brains of the crickets were removed, and then we determined the mitochondrial respiration and production of mitochondrial ROS using our system oxygraphy ‐ 2K (ORORBOROS). Our results show that compares to normoxia; hypoxia significantly reduces mitochondrial respiration of complexes 1 and 1&2. On the other hand, the treatment of EPO in hypoxia, despite significantly increasing these parameters, does not recover the levels of mitochondrial respiration under normoxic conditions. In addition, the activity of complex IV (an indicator of the number of mitochondria) does not vary significantly between any of the treatments. Furthermore, we observed that while hypoxia did not significantly affect H2O2 production, the treatment with EPO increased ROS production under normoxic but not hypoxic conditions. Our data suggest that rhEPO regulates in some way the mitochondrial respiration and ROS production in the brain of crickets. Considering that insects appeared during a geological period (Cambrian explosion) in which the atmospheric O2 was increasing, which could cause great oxidative stress due to the change in the metabolism of these animals, this molecule would have appeared as a regulator of mitochondrial functions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.