Objectives: Sexting, defined as the transmission of sexually suggestive or explicit pictures or videos via mobile phone, has garnered considerable attention in both the public and research sectors. In popular culture, sexting has received considerable negative attention in regards to potential risk. Methods: The present study examined the prevalence of sexting behaviors among 287 volunteer students attending a university in the Southwest United States, as well as the extent to which concerns about sexting appear to be founded or unfounded. Results: Responses indicated that 38% of the participants had sent and/or received sexts during the past 6 months. Of those who engaged in sexting in the past 6 months, 84% had sent 1 to 10 sexts and 88% had received 1 to 10 sexts. Most respondents (64%) indicated that they had sent nude or seminude sexts for consensual sexual reasons. Of those individuals, 87% who reported sending sexts and 71% who reported receiving sexts indicated that the sexting occurred during a romantic relationship. Those who engaged in nude sexting had an earlier age of initiation into sexual behavior and had more sexual partners. Participants who had sent and received nude sexts also had some evidence of risky behavior including drug use and behavior problems in childhood. Additionally, participants who did not engage in sexting scored lower on measures of hostility toward women. Conclusions: Despite these findings, the overall study suggests that sexting may not be a cause for concern. Possible positive aspects of sexting and recommendations for future research are discussed.

Objective: To examine the assumption of measurement invariance across sexes from one representative instrument that uses subscale scores to represent the latent construct intimate partner abuse (IPA). Method: Extant data were used to investigate measurement invariance across sexes with one screening measure of IPA, the Relationship Behavior Rating Scale. This particular measure was used in the current study for the purpose of illustrating the need to investigate measurement equivalence as a standard procedure for all instruments measuring IPA when comparisons across sexes are made. IPA was measured in a sample of 1,654 divorcing individuals mandated to mediation for custody and parenting-time disputes. Results: Although a multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence that the same 5-factor latent model of IPA (coercive controlling behaviors, psychological abuse, physical abuse, threats and escalated violence, and sexual abuse) is measured in men and women, the assumption that an analogous pattern of observed variables contribute to each of the 5 subcategories of IPA was not supported. Exploratory analyses suggest that items measuring threatened and escalated violence and sexual abuse may be a source of such variance across sexes. Conclusions: Measurement invariance is an important step in advancing the empirical investigation of IPA. Future research should explore sources of variance to advance the understanding of similarities and differences between sexes in reporting of IPA.

No abstract

No abstract