Recent research advances on conjugated polymers for photovoltaic devices have focused on creating low band gap materials, but a suitable band gap is only one of many performance criteria required for a successful conjugated polymer. This work focuses on the design of two medium band gap (~2.0 eV) copolymers for use in photovoltaic cells which are designed to possess a high hole mobility and low highest occupied molecular orbital and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy levels. The resulting fluorinated polymer PBnDT-FTAZ exhibits efficiencies above 7% when blended with [6,6]-phenyl C(61)-butyric acid methyl ester in a typical bulk heterojunction, and efficiencies above 6% are still maintained at an active layer thicknesses of 1 μm. PBnDT-FTAZ outperforms poly(3-hexylthiophene), the current medium band gap polymer of choice, and thus is a viable candidate for use in highly efficient tandem cells. PBnDT-FTAZ also highlights other performance criteria which contribute to high photovoltaic efficiency, besides a low band gap.

Fluorinated organic molecules exhibit a series of unique features such as great thermal and oxidative stability, [1] elevated resistance to degradation, [2] enhanced hydrophobicity, high lipophobicity of perfluorinated substances, [3] and inverted charge density distribution in fluorinated aromatic compounds.[4] These special features are related to the unique properties of the fluorine atom:[5] a) fluorine is the most electronegative element, with a Pauling electronegativity of 4.0, which is much larger than that of hydrogen (2.2); b) fluorine is the smallest electron-withdrawing group (van der Waals radius, r = 1.35 , only slightly larger than hydrogen, r = 1.2 ). Furthermore, these fluorine atoms often have a great influence on inter-and intramolecular interactions through C-F···H, F···S, and C-F···p F interactions. [2,6] As a result, fluorinated conjugated materials have been explored for their applications in organic field-effect transistors (OFET) [7] and organic light-emitting diodes (OLED). [4,8] However, there are only a few examples of applying fluorinated compounds in organic photovoltaics, [9] especially as p-type semiconductors in bulk heterojunction (BHJ) polymer solar cells.Since the fluorine atom is a strong electron-withdrawing substituent, the introduction of F into the conjugated backbone would lower both the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) and highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energy levels of the conjugated polymers, as demonstrated by Heeger and BrØdas in a theoretical study of poly(phenylene vinylene) having various substituents. [10] Experimentally, Yu et al. confirmed the electronic effect of the fluorine substituent in their study of a series of benzodithiophene thieno[3,4-b]thiophene copolymers.[9b] After one fluorine atom was substituted onto the thieno [3,4-b]thiophene unit, the copolymer exhibited decreased LUMO and HOMO energy levels, but with a similar band gap, as compared with those of the nonfluorinated analogue. A larger open-circuit voltage (V oc ) was observed from the BHJ device based on the F-substituted polymer, and this difference is largely because of the lower HOMO energy level. Moreover, the short-circuit current (J sc ) and the fill factor (FF) were noticeably increased by judicious selection of solvent and additives, [11] possibly because of an optimized film morphology facilitated by these F atoms. A similar enhancement on the morphology by employing F atoms was observed by Kim et al. in their study of poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) having various end-groups.[9a] The CF 3 end-group-modified P3HT showed significant improvement in both the J sc and FF values for its BHJ devices, thus leading to a 40 % increase in the efficiency (h). The much improved morphology of the polymer/PC 61 BM blend was attributed to the decreased surface energy of the fluorine-containing polymer. However, there has been no precedent study on the photovoltaic properties of F-containing low-band-gap polymers constructed using the donor-acceptor strategy, [12] which is a comm...

No abstract

Three structurally identical polymers, except for the number of fluorine substitutions (0, 1, or 2) on the repeat unit (BnDT-DTBT), are investigated in detail, to further understand the impact of these fluorine atoms on open circuit voltage (V(oc)), short circuit current (J(sc)), and fill factor (FF) of related solar cells. While the enhanced V(oc) can be ascribed to a lower HOMO level of the polymer by adding more fluorine substituents, the improvement in J(sc) and FF are likely due to suppressed charge recombination. While the reduced bimolecular recombination with raising fluorine concentration is confirmed by variable light intensity studies, a plausibly suppressed geminate recombination is implied by the significantly increased change of dipole moment between the ground and excited states (Δμ(ge)) for these polymers as the number of fluorine substituents increases. Moreover, the 2F polymer (PBnDT-DTffBT) exhibits significantly more scattering in the in-plane lamellar stacking and out-of-plane π-π stacking directions, observed with GIWAXS. This indicates that the addition of fluorine leads to a more face-on polymer crystallite orientation with respect to the substrate, which could contribute to the suppressed charge recombination. R-SoXS also reveals that PBnDT-DTffBT has larger and purer polymer/fullerene domains. The higher domain purity is correlated with an observed decrease in PCBM miscibility in polymer, which drops from 21% (PBnDT-DTBT) to 12% (PBnDT-DTffBT). The disclosed "fluorine" impact not only explains the efficiency increase from 4% of PBnDT-DTBT (0F) to 7% with PBnDT-DTffBT (2F) but also suggests fluorine substitution should be generally considered in the future design of new polymers.

Fluorinated organic molecules exhibit a series of unique features such as great thermal and oxidative stability, [1] elevated resistance to degradation, [2] enhanced hydrophobicity, high lipophobicity of perfluorinated substances, [3] and inverted charge density distribution in fluorinated aromatic compounds.[4] These special features are related to the unique properties of the fluorine atom:[5] a) fluorine is the most electronegative element, with a Pauling electronegativity of 4.0, which is much larger than that of hydrogen (2.2); b) fluorine is the smallest electron-withdrawing group (van der Waals radius, r = 1.35 , only slightly larger than hydrogen, r = 1.2 ). Furthermore, these fluorine atoms often have a great influence on inter-and intramolecular interactions through C-F···H, F···S, and C-F···p F interactions. [2,6] As a result, fluorinated conjugated materials have been explored for their applications in organic field-effect transistors (OFET) [7] and organic light-emitting diodes (OLED). [4,8] However, there are only a few examples of applying fluorinated compounds in organic photovoltaics, [9] especially as p-type semiconductors in bulk heterojunction (BHJ) polymer solar cells.Since the fluorine atom is a strong electron-withdrawing substituent, the introduction of F into the conjugated backbone would lower both the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) and highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energy levels of the conjugated polymers, as demonstrated by Heeger and BrØdas in a theoretical study of poly(phenylene vinylene) having various substituents. [10] Experimentally, Yu et al. confirmed the electronic effect of the fluorine substituent in their study of a series of benzodithiophene thieno[3,4-b]thiophene copolymers.[9b] After one fluorine atom was substituted onto the thieno [3,4-b]thiophene unit, the copolymer exhibited decreased LUMO and HOMO energy levels, but with a similar band gap, as compared with those of the nonfluorinated analogue. A larger open-circuit voltage (V oc ) was observed from the BHJ device based on the F-substituted polymer, and this difference is largely because of the lower HOMO energy level. Moreover, the short-circuit current (J sc ) and the fill factor (FF) were noticeably increased by judicious selection of solvent and additives, [11] possibly because of an optimized film morphology facilitated by these F atoms. A similar enhancement on the morphology by employing F atoms was observed by Kim et al. in their study of poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) having various end-groups.[9a] The CF 3 end-group-modified P3HT showed significant improvement in both the J sc and FF values for its BHJ devices, thus leading to a 40 % increase in the efficiency (h). The much improved morphology of the polymer/PC 61 BM blend was attributed to the decreased surface energy of the fluorine-containing polymer. However, there has been no precedent study on the photovoltaic properties of F-containing low-band-gap polymers constructed using the donor-acceptor strategy, [12] which is a comm...