Introduction: Strengthening The Reporting Of Cohort Studies in Surgery (STROCSS) guidelines were developed in 2017 in order to improve the reporting quality of observational studies in surgery and updated in 2019. In order to maintain relevance and continue upholding good reporting quality among observational studies in surgery, we aimed to update STROCSS 2019 guidelines. Methods: A STROCSS 2021 steering group was formed to come up with proposals to update STROCSS 2019 guidelines. An expert panel of researchers assessed these proposals and judged whether they should become part of STROCSS 2021 guidelines or not, through a Delphi consensus exercise. Results: 42 people (89%) completed the DELPHI survey and hence participated in the development of STROCSS 2021 guidelines. All items received a score between 7 and 9 by greater than 70% of the participants, indicating a high level of agreement among the DELPHI group members with the proposed changes to all the items. Conclusion: We present updated STROCSS 2021 guidelines to ensure ongoing good reporting quality among observational studies in surgery.

No abstract

Introduction The development of reporting guidelines over the past 20 years represents a major advance in scholarly publishing with recent evidence showing positive impacts. Whilst over 350 reporting guidelines exist, there are few that are specific to surgery. Here we describe the development of the STROCSS guideline (Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery). Methods and analysis We published our protocol apriori. Current guidelines for case series (PROCESS), cohort studies (STROBE) and randomised controlled trials (CONSORT) were analysed to compile a list of items which were used as baseline material for developing a suitable checklist for surgical cohort guidelines. These were then put forward in a Delphi consensus exercise to an expert panel of 74 surgeons and academics via Google Forms. Results The Delphi exercise was completed by 62% (46/74) of the participants. All the items were passed in a single round to create a STROCSS guideline consisting of 17 items. Conclusion We present the STROCSS guideline for surgical cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies consisting of a 17-item checklist. We hope its use will increase the transparency and reporting quality of such studies. This guideline is also suitable for cross-sectional and case control studies. We encourage authors, reviewers, journal editors and publishers to adopt these guidelines.

BackgroundSevere obesity in adolescence is associated with reduced life expectancy and impaired quality of life. Long-term benefits of conservative treatments in adolescents are limited, while short-term outcomes of adolescent bariatric surgery are promising. This study aimed to report 5-year outcomes following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in adolescents, compared with conservatively treated adolescents and adults undergoing RYGB.MethodsA nationwide prospective non-randomised controlled study of adolescents (13–18 years) with severe obesity undergoing RYGB, a matched adolescent control group undergoing conservative treatment, and an adult comparison group undergoing RYGB. The primary outcome measure was change in weight over 5 years. Multilevel mixed-effect regression models were used to assess longitudinal changes. Healthcare usage was analysed with linear regression together with nonparametric bootstrapping.FindingsEighty-one adolescents with baseline age 16·5 years (SD 1·2), weight 132·8 kg (SD 22·1) and body mass index (BMI) 45·5 kg/m2 (SD 6·1) underwent RYGB. Five-year weight change was −36·8 kg (95% CI −40·9 to −32·8) resulting in a BMI reduction of 13·1 kg/m2, although weight loss <10% occurred in 11%.Comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors resolved in 74–100%: type 2 diabetes (3/3), disturbed glucose homeostasis (18/21), dyslipidaemia (43/52), elevated blood pressure (11/12), inflammation (hs-CRP ≥ 2 mg/L; 45/61) and elevated liver enzymes (19/19), each comparing favourably with adolescent controls at 5 years.Functional (SF-36) and obesity-specific (OP-14) quality of life improved in the adolescent RYGB group (mean difference 4·2, p=0·006 and −9·9 p=0·009). Twenty RYGB participants (25%) underwent additional abdominal surgery for complications of surgery or rapid weight loss, 72% demonstrated some nutritional deficiency, and healthcare consumption increased. Mean BMI increased in control adolescents (3·3 kg/m2, 95% CI 1·9 to 4·8), while BMI change in adults was similar to surgical adolescents (mean difference 0·8 kg/m2, 95% CI −1·1 to 2·8). Twenty adolescent controls (25%) underwent bariatric surgery within 5 years.InterpretationAdolescents with severe obesity undergoing RYGB experienced substantial weight loss over 5 years, alongside improvements in comorbidities, risk factors and quality of life. Surgical intervention was, however, associated with additional surgical interventions and nutritional deficiencies. Non-surgical treatment was associated with weight gain and 25% underwent bariatric surgery within 5 years.