Background: Limited available data have shown latissimus dorsi tendon reconstruction to be an effective treatment for tendon tears in specific subpopulations of elite overhead throwing athletes. Indications: Primary indication for latissimus dorsi tendon reconstruction is a symptomatic, full-thickness humeral avulsion with or without a concomitant teres major tendon tear. Surgical candidates are typically young, high-demand, elite or professional overhead throwing athletes. In this case, the patient is a 29-year-old male former minor league pitcher and current pitching coach with a full-thickness avulsion of the latissimus dorsi tendon. Technique Description: The patient was positioned left lateral decubitus with a dynamic limb positioner maintaining the arm in 90° abduction and maximal internal rotation. This technique used a single posterior axillary incision, which was performed and dissected down to the ruptured latissimus dorsi tendon. We circumferentially applied an acellular dermal allograft to augment the reconstruction at the myotendinous junction. Subsequently, the construct was prepared for transfer with a Krackow suture technique. Suture buttons were used to secure the reconstructed latissimus dorsi tendon to the anatomic footprint on the proximal humerus with a tension slide technique. Results: One case series showed return to the previous level of competition for all baseball pitchers who underwent a latissimus dorsi reconstruction with excellent improvement in visual analog scale pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic scores. Another larger study demonstrated equal return to play rates for professional baseball pitchers with a latissimus dorsi tear treated either nonoperatively or operatively. However, those treated operatively had no decline in performance, whereas the nonoperative cohort saw decline in some statistics. Conclusion: Latissimus dorsi tendon reconstruction using an acellular dermal allograft at the myotendinous junction is a viable treatment option for elite overhead throwing athletes with full-thickness tendon avulsions. It allows for full return to play, particularly if the patient has failed nonoperative management.

Objective. To examine the exercise habits, knowledge, and self-efficacy of incoming medical students. Methods. Mixed-methods study consisting of (1) cross-sectional surveys and (2) qualitative key-informant interviews. (1) International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), American Adult’s Knowledge of Exercise Recommendations Survey (AAKERS), and Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (SEES) to assess student’s physical activity level, knowledge of exercise recommendations, and self-efficacy for exercise. (2) Scripted questions explored exercise habits, sources of exercise knowledge, attitude toward exercise. Results. (1) Results of IPAQ classified students as 50% having high, 40% moderate, and 10% low levels of physical activity (n = 132). AAKERS demonstrated a mean total score of 16.2/20 (n = 130) (81% correct), similar to the national average (mean = 16/20) (n = 2002). SEES mean score of 48.5/90 (n = 128) is similar to previous studies (mean = 48.6/90, 52.75/90). (2) Interviews revealed that most students have a consistent exercise routine. Few students received formal education in exercise (10%), while the rest cited either peers, sports, or internet as primary sources of exercise knowledge. Less than half stated they would be comfortable designing an exercise routine for patients. Conclusions. Incoming medical students live an active lifestyle but have limited knowledge and formal training in exercise. Student’s knowledge is predominantly self-taught from independent resources.

Background. Many diseases are linked to lifestyle in the United States, yet physicians receive little training in nutrition. Medical students’ prior knowledge of nutrition and cooking is unknown. Objective. To determine incoming medical students’ prior nutrition knowledge, culinary skills, and nutrition habits. Methods. A dual-methods study of first-year medical students. Cross-sectional survey assessing prior knowledge, self-efficacy, and previous education of cooking and nutrition. Interviews of second-year medical students explored cooking and nutrition in greater depth. Results. A total of 142 first-year medical students participated; 16% had taken a nutrition course, with majority (66%) learning outside classroom settings. Students had a mean score of 87% on the Nutritional Knowledge Questionnaire versus comparison group (64.9%). Mean cooking and food skills score were lower than comparison scores. Overall, students did not meet guidelines for fiber, fruit, vegetables, and whole grains. Interviews with second-year students revealed most learned to cook from their families; all believed it important for physicians to have this knowledge. Conclusions. Medical students were knowledgeable about nutrition, but typically self-taught. They were not as confident or skilled in cooking, and mostly learned from their family. They expressed interest in learning more about nutrition and cooking.

Introduction Orthopedic trauma is a significant portion of global burden of disease in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This has led the World Health Organization to advocate for increased surgical intervention in LMICs. The two largest barriers to orthopedic surgical care for LMICs are cost of procedure and geographic access to centers with appropriate surgical capabilities. There is no current consensus on how to structure surgical interventional teams. The overall objective of this study is to describe the composition of a forward surgical team (FST), including its abilities and limitations. It is hypothesized that an FST is an effective model for orthopedic surgical relief efforts in LMICs. Methods A narrative literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis standards published by the National Academies of Medicine. Studies were evaluated by structured review procedures to identify an FST’s capacity for orthopedic surgery, as well as applicability for humanitarian care. Articles detailing FST logistics, types of orthopedic treatment provided, and instances of humanitarian care while deployed in austere environments were included for review. Results The FST is a military surgical unit operating with a small crew of surgeons and supporting staff who use tents or trailers that can be positioned near points of conflict, often in remote or austere environments. FSTs were designed to treat traumatic injuries, including orthopedic trauma from RTIs. If used as a sponsored humanitarian aid mission, FSTs can provide surgical care at free or greatly reduced costs. Because FSTs carry limited supplies and personnel, they are highly mobile surgical units that can be transported via truck. Conclusion FSTs are effective models for humanitarian orthopedic surgery in LMICs. FSTs were designed to treat orthopedic trauma, the largest burden of orthopedic care in LMICs. Efficient use of limited equipment allows FSTs to be cost effective for funding sources and highly mobile to reduce the geographic barrier to care. Further research is needed to determine the cost to operate an FST and ethical consideration for military intervention for foreign humanitarian aid.

Purpose Joint arthroplasty has become increasingly more common in the United States, and it is important to examine the patient-based risk factors and surgical variables associated with hospital readmissions. The purpose of this study was to identify stratified rates and risk factors for readmission after upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, and wrist) and lower extremity (hip, knee, and ankle) arthroplasty. Methods All patients undergoing upper and lower extremity arthroplasty from 2008–2018 were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities and surgical characteristics were examined utilizing uni- and multi-variate analysis for significant predictors of 30-days hospital readmission. Results A total of 523,523 lower and 25,215 upper extremity arthroplasty patients were included in this study. A number of 22,183 (4.2%) lower and 1072 (4.4%) upper extremity arthroplasty patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Significant risk factors for 30-days readmission after lower extremity arthroplasty included age, Body Mass Index (BMI), operative time, dependent functional status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3, increased length of stay, and various medical comorbidities such as diabetes, tobacco dependency, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). An overweight BMI was associated with a lower odds of 30-days readmission when compared to a normal BMI for lower extremity arthroplasty. Analysis for upper extremity arthroplasty revealed similar findings of significant risk factors for 30-days hospital readmission, although diabetes mellitus was not found to be a significant risk factor. Conclusion Nearly one in 25 patients undergoing upper and lower extremity arthroplasty experiences hospital readmission within 30-days of index surgery. There are several modifiable risk factors for 30-days hospital readmission shared by both lower and upper extremity arthroplasty, including tobacco smoking, COPD, and hypertension. Optimization of these medical comorbidities may mitigate the risk short-term readmission following joint arthroplasty procedures and improve overall cost effectiveness of perioperative surgical care.