No abstract

Progressive resistance training (RT) is one of the most effective interventions for reducing age-related deficits in muscle mass and functional capacity. Purpose To compare four approaches to load progressions in RT for older adults to determine if an optimal method exists. Methods Eighty-two healthy community-dwelling older adults (71.8 ± 6.2 yr) performed 11 wk of structured RT (2.5 d·wk−1) in treatment groups differing only by the method used to increase training loads. These included percent one repetition maximum (%1RM): standardized loads based on a percentage of the one repetition maximum (1RM); rating of perceived exertion (RPE): loads increased when perceived difficulty falls below 8/10 on the OMNI-Resistance Exercise Scale perceived exertion scale; repetition maximum (RM): loads increased when a target number of repetitions can be completed with a given load; repetitions in reserve (RiR): identical to RM except subjects must always maintain ≥1 “repetition in reserve,” thus avoiding the possibility of training to temporary muscular failure. Results Multiple analyses of covariance indicated no significant between-group differences on any strength (chest press 1RM; leg press 1RM) or functional performance outcome (usual walking speed, maximum walking speed, 8-ft timed up-and-go, gallon jug transfer test, 30 s sit-to-stand). The RPE group found the exercise to be significantly more tolerable and enjoyable than subjects in the RiR, RM, and %1RM groups. Conclusion Given the RM, RPE, %1RM, and RiR methods appear equally effective at improving muscular strength and functional performance in an older population, we conclude that the RPE method is optimal because it is likely to be perceived as the most tolerable and enjoyable, which are two important factors determining older adults’ continued participation in RT.

The presence of postganglionic sympathetic denervation is well established in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Denervation at cardiac and blood vessel sites may lead to abnormal cardiovascular and hemodynamic responses to exercise. The aim of the present investigation was to examine how heart rate (HR) and hemodynamics are affected by an exercise test in PD patients without orthostatic hypotension. Thirty individuals without orthostatic hypotension, 14 individuals with PD, and 16 age-matched healthy controls performed an exercise test on a cycle ergometer. Heart rate, blood pressure, and other hemodynamic variables were measured in a fasted state during supine rest, active standing, exercise, and supine recovery. Peak HR and percent of age-predicted maximum HR (HRmax) achieved were significantly blunted in PD (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). HR remained significantly elevated in PD during recovery compared with controls (p = 0.03, p < 0.05). Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures were significantly lower at multiple time-points during active standing in PD compared with controls. Systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) decreased significantly at the onset of exercise in PD, and remained significantly lower during exercise and the first minute of supine recovery. End diastolic volume index (EDVI) was significantly lower in PD during supine rest and recovery. Our results indicate for the first time that normal hemodynamics are disrupted during orthostatic stress and exercise in PD. Despite significant differences in EDVI at rest and during recovery, and SVRI during exercise, cardiac index was unaffected. Our finding of significantly blunted HRmax and HR recovery in PD patients has substantial implications for exercise prescription and recovery guidelines.

Background:Soft tissue quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts are increasingly popular as a primary graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but no study has compared superficial quadriceps activity levels and leg extension strength for QT versus bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) autografts.Hypothesis:Harvesting the central portion of the QT will alter rectus femoris (RF) firing patterns during maximum voluntary isometric contraction.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A total of 34 patients (age range, 18-40 years) who underwent ACLR using a BTB (n = 17) or QT (n = 17) autograft at a single institution participated in this study. Participants, who had no neuromuscular injury or prior surgery on either lower extremity, were at least 1 year after ACLR, and were cleared for full activity. Postoperative rehabilitation protocols were consistent across participants. Synchronized electromyography (EMG) and isometric torque data were collected from participants in the seated position with the hips flexed to 90° and the knee at 60° of flexion. Participants were asked to extend their knees as quickly as possible and perform maximum voluntary isometric contraction for 3 seconds. A practice trial and 3 test trials were completed with 30-second rest intervals. Mixed (2 graft × 2 limb) analyses of variance were used to examine differences in average and peak torque values and RF/vastus lateralis (VL) and RF/vastus medialis (VM) ratios. Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were compared between groups using unpaired t tests.Results:Significantly lower values were seen for the operative compared with the nonoperative extremity for average (P = .008; η2 = 0.201) and peak torque (P < .0001; η2 = 0.321), with no significant difference between graft types. Additionally, no significant differences in RF/VL or RF/VM ratios between limbs or graft types were observed.Conclusion:At 1 year after ACLR, QT and BTB autografts showed similar isometric strength deficits, with no differences in quadriceps muscle EMG ratios seen between the 2 graft types. The results support the use of a QT autograft for ACLR, as its graft harvest does not adversely affect quadriceps firing patterns in comparison with BTB graft harvest.

No abstract