No abstract

Eocene nummulite accumulations, also referred to as nummulite "banks", form important hydrocarbon reservoirs in Tunisia and Libya and may constitute exploration targets in other parts of North Africa, the Mediterranean and the Middle East. Porosities commonly average 10-20% and permeabilities 10-50md. Foraminifera of the genus Nummulites may comprise up to 98% of the bioclasts in these carbonate reservoirs, although only one or two species may be present. The absence of associated fauna is generally taken to indicate an oligotrophic depositional environment.In this paper, the palaeoecology of the genus Nummulites is discussed together with depositional models for two nummulitic carbonate reservoirsthe Middle Eocene SeebLimestone of Oman and the Early Eocene El GaridJdeir Formation of Tunisia and Libya. The El Garia and Seeb Limestone Formations were deposited in ramp settings, and comprise a series of amalgamated sheets or low-relief banks. In the Hasdrubal field offshore Tunisia, where the El Garia Formation constitutes the reservoir rock, most of the nummulites have been redeposited from shallow into deeper waters whilst in the Bourri field (offshore Libya) they occur as an in situ "bank". Nummulite accumulations often show evidence that both physical reworking (scouring, winnowing and imbrication) and biological processes (reproduction strategies and bioturbation) have influenced their formation. A general model is outlined for discriminating between physically and ecologically produced biofabrics, and the implications for reservoir quality are discussed.

No abstract

New palynological results are presented and integrated with previous data for the Mesozoic

New geological data are presented and previously published information is reviewed to demonstrate that much of the Khorat Group (Phu Kradung to Khok Kruat Formations) of NE Thailand is Early Cretaceous in age. It is suggested that the Mesozoic red bed sequences of neighbouring Indochina are likely to be of similar age rather than spanning the entire Late Triassic to Early Cretaceous as previously assumed. Moreover, the Lower Nam Phong Formation dated as Late Triassic and previously included as the basal formation of the Khorat Group is now removed from this group, thus creating a hiatus within the Jurassic. There is therefore no clear relationship between the Indosinian Orogeny and the Triassic collision of the Sibumasu (also referred to as Shan-Thai) and Indochina Blocks and the subsequent deposition of the Khorat Group in a Late Triassic-Early Cretaceous thermal sag basin. It is now proposed that much of the sequence was deposited during the Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous. Jurassic sediments may be absent across much of the Khorat Plateau whereas marine Jurassic sediments to the west and east show no sediments younger than Bajocian. Because sea levels were generally rising in the Middle and Late Jurassic it is likely that the Khorat region was uplifted at this time. It is suggested that the Khorat Group was originally deposited in a foreland basin setting rather than a thermal sag basin following Late Triassic rifting. Moreover, the original site of deposition was to the north in southern China, with the present-day location being the result of movement along the Red River Fault coupled with a clockwise rotation of the Indochina Block (on which the Khorat Group sits) with respect to the South China Block.