No abstract

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare genetic disorder characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification (HO), often heralded by flare-ups, leading to reduced movement and life expectancy. This placebo-controlled, double-blind trial (NCT02190747) evaluated palovarotene, an orally bioavailable selective retinoic acid receptor gamma agonist, for prevention of HO in patients with FOP. Patients experiencing a flare-up were enrolled in two cohorts: (1) patients ≥15 years were randomized 3:1 to palovarotene 10/5 mg (weeks 1-2/3-6) or placebo; (2) patients ≥6 years were randomized 3:3:2 to palovarotene 10/5 mg, palovarotene 5/2.5 mg (weeks 1-2/3-6), or placebo. Cohort data were pooled. The primary endpoint was the proportion of responders (no/minimal new HO at flare-up body region by plain radiograph) at week 6. Change from baseline in HO volume and new HO incidence were assessed by computed tomography (CT) at week 12. Tissue edema was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound. Forty patients (aged 7-53 years) were enrolled (placebo: n = 10; palovarotene 5/2.5 mg: n = 9; palovarotene 10/5 mg: n = 21). Disease history was similar between groups. In the per-protocol population, the proportion of responders at week 6 by plain radiograph was 100% with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 88.9% with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 88.9% with placebo (Cochran-Armitage trend test: p = 0.17). At week 12, the proportions were 95.0% with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 88.9% with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 77.8% with placebo (Cochran-Armitage trend test: p = 0.15). Week 12 least-squares mean (LSmean) new HO volume, assessed by CT, was 3.8 Â 10 3 mm 3 with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 1.3 Â 10 3 mm 3 with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 18.0 Â 10 3 mm 3 with placebo (pairwise tests versus placebo: p ≤ 0.12). Palovarotene was well-tolerated. No patients discontinued treatment or required dose reduction; one patient had dose interruption due to elevated lipase. Although these findings were not statistically significant, they support further evaluation of palovarotene for prevention of HO in FOP in larger studies.

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare, severely disabling genetic disorder of progressive heterotopic ossification (HO). The single-arm, open-label, phase 3 MOVE trial (NCT03312634) assessed efficacy and safety of palovarotene, a selective retinoic acid receptor gamma agonist, in patients with FOP. Findings were compared with FOP natural history study (NHS; NCT02322255) participants untreated beyond standard of care. Patients aged ≥4 years received palovarotene once daily (chronic: 5 mg; flare-up: 20 mg for 4 weeks, then 10 mg for ≥8 weeks; weight-adjusted if skeletally immature). The primary endpoint was annualized change in new HO volume versus NHS participants (by low-dose whole-body computed tomography [WBCT]), analyzed using a Bayesian compound Poisson model (BcPM) with square-root transformation. Twelve-month interim analyses met futility criteria; dosing was paused. An independent Data Monitoring Committee recommended trial continuation. Post hoc 18-month interim analyses utilized BcPM with square-root transformation and HO data collapsed to equalize MOVE and NHS visit schedules, BcPM without transformation, and weighted linear mixed-effects (wLME) models, alongside prespecified analysis. Safety was assessed throughout. Eighteen-month interim analyses included 97 MOVE and 101 NHS individuals with post-baseline WBCT. BcPM analyses without transformation showed 99.4% probability of any reduction in new HO with palovarotene versus NHS participants (with transformation: 65.4%). Mean annualized new HO volume was 60% lower in MOVE versus the NHS.

What is this summary about? This is a plain language summary of an article originally published in the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. People with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) become physically disabled over time as new bone forms in places where it is not usually found, such as in muscles and ligaments. Until recently, there were no treatments for FOP that had been proven through clinical trials; however, a drug called palovarotene has been tested in clinical trials and may be effective. Here, we describe the MOVE trial, which investigated how effectively palovarotene works, as well as its safety in treating patients with FOP. What were the results? Results from MOVE suggest that palovarotene may reduce extra bone formation outside the normal skeleton. Patients with FOP who took palovarotene formed less new bone than those who did not take palovarotene. The most common side effects involved the skin, and included dryness and irritation. Some children who were still growing when they took palovarotene had a side effect that resulted in the (normal) growth of their skeleton stopping too soon. What do the results of the trial mean? Palovarotene may be a useful treatment option for FOP. Patients, caregivers, and doctors would need to consider the benefits and risks of treatment with palovarotene, particularly with growing children. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03312634 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )

Background and Objective Palovarotene, a selective retinoic acid receptor γ agonist, is under investigation for the treatment of dry eye disease. This study aimed to determine the ocular and systemic safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of palovarotene ophthalmic solution (PVO-OS) in healthy adults. Methods This was a randomised, vehicle-controlled phase I study (NCT04762355; retrospectively registered). Participants received either PVO-OS (at 0.025, 0.05 or 0.10 mg/mL) or a vehicle (placebo-to-match PVO-OS) once-daily or twice-daily for seven consecutive days. Safety was assessed by ocular and systemic assessments. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessments were collected before and after dose administration. Results Thirty-six participants were randomised to PVO-OS and 12 to the vehicle. Overall, 89 treatment-emergent ocular adverse events (TEOAEs) were reported by 22 participants (61.1%) receiving PVO-OS and ten TEOAEs were reported by five participants (41.7%) receiving the vehicle. Erythema, irritation and skin dryness of the eyelid were the most common TEOAEs in participants receiving PVO-OS. The incidence of TEOAEs and eyelid-related findings in the PVO-OS groups increased with ascending dose and frequency compared with participants treated with the vehicle. All TEOAEs were mild (96.6%) or moderate (3.4%) and resolved without sequelae. Plasma palovarotene concentrations were generally measurable for up to 3-4 h for 0.025 mg/mL and 0.05 mg/mL and up to 12 h for 0.10 mg/mL dose regimens, independent of the frequency of administration. Conclusions PVO-OS was generally well tolerated at doses up to and including 0.10 mg/mL twice daily. Similar pharmacokinetic profiles were observed for the once-daily and twice-daily regimens following multiple ascending doses of PVO-OS.