Solid organ transplantation provides life saving therapy for patients with end stage organ disease. In order that the transplanted organ survive, the recipient must take a lifelong cocktail of immunosuppressive medications that increase the risk for infections, malignancies and drug toxicities. Data from many animal studies have shown that recipients can be made tolerant of their transplanted organ by infusing stem cells, particularly hematopoietic stem cells, prior to the transplant. The animal data have been translated into humans and now several clinical trials have demonstrated that infusion of hematopoietic stem cells, along with specialized conditioning regimens, can permit solid organ allograft survival without immunosuppressive medications. This important therapeutic advance has been made possible by understanding the immunologic mechanisms by which stem cells modify the host immune system, although it must be cautioned that the conditioning regimens are often severe and associated with significant morbidity. This review discusses the role of hematopoietic stem cells in solid organ transplantation, provides an understanding of how these stem cells modify the host immune system and describes how newer information about adaptive and innate immunity might lead to improvements in the use of hematopoietic stem cells to induce tolerance to transplanted organs.

Background: Gender-biased outcomes are associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) and human and animal studies have shown that females are preferentially protected from renal ischemia. However, the reason for this is not known. One clue might lie with pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which are triggers of ischemic injury when ligated by molecules in the ischemic milieu. Several PRR families are expressed by renal tubular epithelial cells (RTEs) and incite cell death signaling and production of pro-inflammatory molecules. Blockade of specific PRRs (e.g., TLR2, NOD1, NOD2, and NLRP3) provides highly significant protection from ischemic RTE injury. As a first step to understand gender-biased outcomes of AKI, we tested whether constitutive gender-based differences exist in expression of these PRRS in RTEs. Methods: To determine whether PRR expression differences exist, primary RTEs isolated from male and female WT kidneys were examined by FACS, qPCR, and Western Blot for expression of TLR2, NOD1, NOD2, and NLRP3 inflammasome components. Results: No RTE gender-based differences in TLR2, NOD1, NOD2, NLRP3, or ASC were found. RTEs from female kidneys had approximately half the mRNA, but the same protein concentration of pro-caspase-1 compared to RTEs isolated from male kidneys. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that intrinsic gender differences in RTE expression of TLR2, NOD1, NOD2, NLRP3, and ASC are not responsible for the gender-biased outcomes observed in ischemia/reperfusion injury. The lower caspase-1 mRNA expression in RTEs from females warrants further exploration of additional upstream signals that might differentially regulate caspase-1 in male vs. female RTEs.

Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) play an important role in host anti-donor responses to transplanted tissue. A key trigger of the host alloresponse involves recognition of foreign antigen presented on activated antigen presenting cells by the host T cells. Emerging data suggest that PRR blockade can abrogate host anti-donor responses by interfering with activation of antigen presenting cells, particularly activation of dendritic cells. Our study asked whether blockade of a well-characterized family of intracellular PRRs, the NOD family, interfered with alloantigen recognition and allograft rejection. We found that deletion of either NOD1 or NOD2 in antigen presenting cells (APCs) had no effect on induction of T cell proliferation to alloantigen, but that simultaneous deletion of NOD1 and NOD2 significantly inhibited T cell responses. There was however no effect of the NOD deletion on skin graft rejection when NOD1xNOD2 skin was transplanted onto allogeneic hosts or when WT skin was transplanted onto NOD1xNOD2 deficient recipients. The conclusion of this study is that in vitro alloresponses are negatively impacted by the simultaneous deletion of NOD1 and NOD2, but that allograft rejection across a stringent allo barrier is not affected. Our results suggest that the NOD family members, NOD1 and NOD2, play a collaborative role in T cell activation by alloantigen and that their blockade in vitro can inhibit T cell responses.