Pediatric deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an emerging problem in tertiary care hospitals, recent reviews shows a rate of 40.2/10,000 admissions. Experts affirm that enoxaparin has become in the drug of choice for DVT therapy. Despite this, there is a little information regarding the optimal dose schedule for enoxaparin therapy in children and the therapeutic guidelines for enoxaparin use in children are extrapolated from adult guidelines. Monitoring by antifactor Xa (anti-Xa) measurement and target concentrations between 0.5-1 U/ml at 4-6 h postdose are recommended. This study was designed to analyse our experience in paediatric-specific dosage requirements for enoxaparin therapy. A retrospective study was performed with patients less than 16 years old, who were treated with enoxaparin for DVT and monitored by anti-Xa concentration, between January 2005 and March 2012. Demographic and clinical characteristics and outcomes were obtained. Fourteen patients were analyzed: boy/girl ratio, 8/4; median age, 3.5 months. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis was the most common indication for therapy. All patients presented thrombosis risks factors. Dose increases were necessary only in patients less than 6 years old. Target anti-Xa concentrations were achieved in 12 (85%) patients. Children younger than 1 year required a higher dose of enoxaparin/kg (1.5-2.7 mg/kg per 12 h). Complete resolutions of DVT were registered in all cases. The mean number of dose increases was three and a median of 11 days to achieve target anti-Xa concentration. This study indicates that an initial higher enoxaparin dose may be necessary in neonates and infants, but other factors must be considered to improve management.

The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of 37 follicular lymphoma (FL) patients treated with (90)ytrium ibritumomab tiuxetan (90Y-IT), outside of clinical trial, according to protocol ISCRTN36210045, after ≥5 years follow-up to February 2014. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was evaluated with the SF-36, Spanish version, and compared with the general population of Spain. Patients had a mean age of 61.9 (range, 30-85) years and included 18 males. FLIPI, low: 25 (67.6 %), intermedium 9 (24.3 %), and low 3 (8.1 %). Previous therapy schedules >2: 48.6 % The median follow-up was 66 months, mean Time to Relapse (TTR) 71.3 months (58.8-83.8) median not reached. Thirty-four patients achieved complete response (91.8 %), and three no response. Mean overall survival: 82.3 months (71.6-92.9). Four patients presented with concomitant tumors (colon, breast, prostate, lung) after radioimmunotherapy, and three developed second primary neoplasms (esophagus, renal, and myelodysplastic syndrome in a relapsed patient who received fludarabine). Four of 10 deaths were related to lymphoma progression. Hematological toxicities were mild and easily managed. No patients required hospitalization. Negative scores were obtained in the physical and emotional roles items; however, the perception of general health and vitality were better than in the general population, with the best outcomes in non-relapsed patients. Radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-IT was safe and effective as long-term therapy in patients with FL. Early use of radioimmunotherapy could offer good, sustained responses with low toxicity over the long term and acceptable HRQoL.

No abstract

Background Proteasoma inhibitors have proven to be one of the major advances on multiple myeloma (MM) therapy. Their principal effect in growth inhibition of MM cells is achieved not only through the inhibition of proteasomes but also by preventing the adhesion of myeloma cells to stromal cells, induction of cytokines by the microenvironment, decrease angiogenic activity and a direct apoptotic effect on MM cells. Actually it is part of the first-line standard of care therapy for patients with MM. On the other hand, multiple strategies have been developed for trying to predict response or improve the assessment of response and follow-up of MM patients. Currently, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria of response include immunophenotype and immunoparesis analysis. The HevyLiteTM and FreeLiteTM assays (The Binding Site Ltd. Birminghan. UK) permit a separate quantification of the amount of kappa- and lambda-bound to a given immunoglobulin (HLC) and the free light chains kappa or lambda amount quantification (FLC), both being excellent tools for immunoparesis assessment. Aims To analyze the usefulness of immunoparesis analysis by HevyLiteTM and FreeliteTM in patients who receive bortezomib-based therapy in our institution. Patients and Methods A retrospective chart review was performed including the patients diagnosed with secretor IgA or IgG MM who received therapy with bortezomib either at relapse or as first-line therapy. General clinical characteristics, therapy schedules, number of cycles, response to therapy according IMWG criteria and relapse were recorded. For the analysis, only patients with at least 4 cycles of bortezomib based regimen and HLC and/or FLC analysis performed between 4-12 weeks after complete therapy were included. Period of study: June 2004 to April 2013. Results At the end of study a total of 67 MM patients had received bortezomib-based therapy, 63 of them completed 4 or more cycles and were included in the analysis. Male/Female ratio: 31/32, mean age: 66.9 years old (46-81), therapeutic schedules were: bortezomib-prednisone: 3 (4.7%), bortezomib-dexametasone: 33 (51.6%), bortezomib-melfalan-prednisone: 18 (28.1%), bortezomib-dexametasone-lenalidomide: 8 (12.5%) and bortezomib-talidomide-dexametasone: 1 (1.6%). 55% of patients received at least 6 cycles of therapy. Immunoglobulin Myeloma subtype: IgAL: 13 (20.4%) patients, IgAK: 10 (15.6%) patients, IgGK: 32 (50.8%) patients and IgGL: 8 (14.1%) patients. A total of 46 (73%) patients showed an abnormal HLC ratio at diagnosis and 48 (76,2%) had immunoparesis before therapy; a total of 47 (74.6%) registered an abnormal FLC ratio at diagnosis. The response to therapy was: 15 (23.8%) of cases achieved a stringent complete response (SR), 3 (4.8%) a very good partial response (VGPR), 36 (57.1%) obtained a partial response (PR) and 9 (14.3%) patients had not-response/progressive-disease. At the time of post-therapy evaluation, 26 (37%) of patients had normalized FLC-ratio, 15 (23.8%) maintain the SR, 1 (1,6%) patient in VGPR and 5 (11.1%) in PR and 1 (1.6%) of non-responder patients. Normalization of HLC-ratio was only observed in patients with SR and VGPR: 13 (20.6%). Regarding the immunoparesis analysis, only 15 (23.8%) of patients with immunoparesis recovered the immune restitution (IR) at the end of therapy, of which 8 (11.7%) were SR patients, 2 VGPR and 5 PR patients. At the end of the study 47(71.4%) patients relapsed, 5 (11.11%) are on maintenance therapy and 11(17.4%) after a median follow-up of 29 months (9-94) without therapy not-relapsed; the association of SR with IR was related to a less tendency to relapse and need of therapy, 7/8 patients who achieved this status are not-relapsed. Conclusion In our cohort, patients who achieved a SR with a normalization of immunoparesis shows a clear tendency to less incidence of relapse; probably reflecting a better response with not only an undetectable monoclonal protein but also the recovery of the immune function. Even in small cohorts, the immunoparesis recovery analysis through HLC quantifications seems to be an useful tool to determine a new level of response. More investigations on this field are warranted. This work has been partially supported by a grant from Fundación para el Estudio de la Hematología y hemoterapia en Aragón (FEHHA) Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.