Different species have developed different solutions to the problem of constructing a representation of the environment from sensory images projected onto sensory surfaces. Comprehension of how these images are formed is an essential first step in understanding the representation of external reality by a given sensory system. Modeling of the electrical sensory images of objects began with the discovery of electroreception and continues to provide general insights into the mechanisms of imaging. Progress in electric image research has made it possible to establish the physical basis of electric imaging, as well as methods to accurately predict the electric images of objects alone and as a part of a natural electric scene. In this review, we show the following. (1) The internal low resistance of the fish's body shapes the image in two different ways: by funneling the current generated by the electric organ to the sensory surface, it increases the fields rostrally, thus enhancing the perturbation produced by nearby objects; and by increasing the projected image. (2) The electric fish's self-generated currents are modified by capacitive objects in a distinctive manner. These modulations can be detected by different receptor types, yielding the possibility of "electric color." (3) The effects of different objects in a scene interact with each other, generating an image that is different from the simple addition of the images of individual objects, thus causing strong contextual effects.

The electrosensory lobe (ELL) of mormyrid electric fish is the first stage in the central processing of sensory input from electroreceptors. The responses of cells in ELL to electrosensory input are strongly affected by corollary discharge signals associated with the motor command that drives the electric organ discharge (EOD). This study used intracellular recording and staining to describe the physiology of three major cell types in the mormyrid ELL: the medium ganglion cell, the large ganglion cell, and the large fusiform cell. The medium ganglion cell is a Purkinje-like interneuron, whereas the large ganglion and large fusiform cells are efferent neurons that convey electrosensory information to higher stages of the system. Clear differences were observed among the three cell types. Medium ganglion cells showed two types of spikes, a small narrow spike and a large broad spike that were probably of axonal and dendro-somatic origin, respectively, whereas the large ganglion and large fusiform cells showed only large narrow spikes. Most of the medium ganglion cells and all of the large ganglion cells were inhibited by electrosensory stimuli in the center of their receptive fields, whereas the large fusiform cells were excited by such stimuli.Responses to the EOD corollary discharge were different in the three cell types, and these responses underwent plastic changes after a few minutes of pairing with an electrosensory stimulus. Plastic changes were also observed in medium and large ganglion cells after the corollary discharge was paired with depolarizing, intracellular current pulses.

No abstract

Key scientific discoveries have resulted from genetic studies of Drosophila melanogaster, using a multitude of transgenic fly strains, the majority of which are constructed in a genetic background containing mutations in the white gene. Here we report that white mutant flies from w1118 strain undergo retinal degeneration. We observed also that w1118 mutants have progressive loss of climbing ability, shortened life span, as well as impaired resistance to various forms of stress. Retinal degeneration was abolished by transgenic expression of mini-white+ in the white null background w1118. We conclude that beyond the classical eye-color phenotype, mutations in Drosophila white gene could impair several biological functions affecting parameters like mobility, life span and stress tolerance. Consequently, we suggest caution and attentiveness during the interpretation of old experiments employing white mutant flies and when planning new ones, especially within the research field of neurodegeneration and neuroprotection. We also encourage that the use of w1118 strain as a wild-type control should be avoided.