BACKGROUND 5α-Reductase 2 deficiency (5ARD) is a known cause of 46,XY disorders of sex development (DSD). Traditionally, the diagnosis relies on dihydrotestosterone (DHT) measurement, but the results are often equivocal, potentially leading to misdiagnosis. We reviewed alternative approaches for diagnosis of 5ARD. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of the results of urinary steroid profiling (USP) by GC-MS and mutational analysis of SRD5A2 [steroid-5-alpha-reductase, alpha polypeptide 2 (3-oxo-5 alpha-steroid delta 4-dehydrogenase alpha 2)] by PCR and direct DNA sequencing of all 46,XY DSD patients referred to our laboratory with biochemical and/or genetic findings compatible with 5ARD. We also performed a literature review on the laboratory findings of all 5ARD cases reported in the past 10 years. RESULTS Of 16 patients diagnosed with 5ARD between January 2003 and July 2012, 15 underwent USP, and all showed characteristically low 5α- to 5β-reduced steroid metabolite ratios. Four patients had DHT measured, but 2 did not reach the diagnostic cutoff. In all 12 patients who underwent genetic analysis, 2 mutations of the SRD5A2 gene were detected to confirm the diagnosis. Twenty-four publications involving 149 patients with 5ARD were published in the review period. Fewer than half of these patients had DHT tested. Nearly 95% of them had the diagnosis confirmed genetically. CONCLUSIONS 5ARD can be confidently diagnosed by USP at 3 months postnatally and confirmed by mutational analysis of SRD5A2. Interpretation of DHT results may be problematic and is not essential in the diagnosis of 5ARD. We propose new diagnostic algorithms for 46,XY DSD.

Paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine neoplasms in the vagina, and their molecular pathogenesis has not been documented. We report a case of vaginal paraganglioma in a 15-yr-old adolescent girl who presented with irregular heavy menses and anemic symptoms. Examination under anesthesia revealed a polypoid mass of 3 cm size in the left anterior vaginal wall, which was resected piecemeal. Histology showed a circumscribed nodular tumor with typical nested morphology of paraganglioma and no significant nuclear atypia. Immunohistochemically the tumor cells were diffusely positive for synaptophysin and chromogranin while being negative for cytokeratin, accompanied by S100-positive sustentacular cells. SDHB immunohistochemistry demonstrated the absence of cytoplasmic staining in the tumor cells with preserved staining in sustentacular cells, raising the possibility of a germline mutation in the genes encoding subunits of succinate dehydrogenase. Sanger sequencing for all the exons and exon-flanking intronic regions of the SDHB gene revealed no mutation, but further investigation with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification identified a heterozygous deletion of exon 1 of the SDHB gene in the patient and her mother, confirming the diagnosis of SDHB-related hereditary paraganglioma-pheochromocytoma syndrome. The patient had no evidence of disease upon imaging surveillance and follow-up for 56 mo. A review of the published cases of vaginal paraganglioma seems to suggest a relatively young age of presentation, commonly encountered as incidental findings in asymptomatic patients or presenting with abnormal vaginal bleeding. The association between vaginal paraganglioma and germline SDHB mutation has not been reported. We believe this case illustrates the clinical significance of SDHB immunohistochemistry and genetic testing for this rare vaginal neoplasm.

Background: The embryonic staging system based on the number of days post coitum is not always adequate to describe the rapid changes that occur during early organogenesis, and appropriate morphological features that can be easily referred to are important in descriptive embryology. Aims: The present study aims to ascertain whether somites can be used to determine both the developmental stage of mouse embryos and the axial level of embryonic structures from 9.5 days post coitum onwards. Results: The somite number could be easily counted after cresyl violet staining from 9.5 to 12.5 days post coitum, and the first few somites started to de-epithelialize by 10.0 days post coitum. However, from 12.5 days post coitum onwards, somites became difficult to count because of the thick surface epithelium. Vital dye labelling followed by whole embryo culture demonstrated that somites, limb buds and various regions of the neural tube did not undergo any major positional shift in relation to each other. Conclusions: From 9.5 to 12.5 days post coitum, the ease of somite count and the minimal positional shift in somites, limb buds and the neural tube implicate that the somite can be a convenient morphological reference for both the embryonic stage and the axial level of developing structures including limb buds and different regions of the neural tube during this period.